Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;28(3):727-733.
doi: 10.1007/s00338-009-0520-x.

Restoration of coral populations in light of genetic diversity estimates

T L Shearer  1 , I Porto, A L Zubillaga
Affiliations

Restoration of coral populations in light of genetic diversity estimates

T L Shearer et al. Coral Reefs. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Due to the importance of preserving the genetic integrity of populations, strategies to restore damaged coral reefs should attempt to retain the allelic diversity of the disturbed population; however, genetic diversity estimates are not available for most coral populations. To provide a generalized estimate of genetic diversity (in terms of allelic richness) of scleractinian coral populations, the literature was surveyed for studies describing the genetic structure of coral populations using microsatellites. The mean number of alleles per locus across 72 surveyed scleractinian coral populations was 8.27 (±0.75 SE). In addition, population genetic datasets from four species (Acropora palmata, Montastraea cavernosa, Montastraea faveolata and Pocillopora damicornis) were analyzed to assess the minimum number of donor colonies required to retain specific proportions of the genetic diversity of the population. Rarefaction analysis of the population genetic datasets indicated that using 10 donor colonies randomly sampled from the original population would retain >50% of the allelic diversity, while 35 colonies would retain >90% of the original diversity. In general, scleractinian coral populations are genetically diverse and restoration methods utilizing few clonal genotypes to re-populate a reef will diminish the genetic integrity of the population. Coral restoration strategies using 10-35 randomly selected local donor colonies will retain at least 50-90% of the genetic diversity of the original population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Rarefaction analysis of four scleractinian coral species. Gray lines represent individual populations and the black line represents the mean of the populations
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Altizer S, Harvell D, Friedle E. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:589–596.
    1. Amar KO, Rinkevich B. A floating mid-water coral nursery as larval dispersion hub: Testing an idea. Mar Biol. 2007;151:713–718.
    1. Anonymous. Endangered and threatened species: Final listing determinations for elkhorn coral and staghorn coral. Fed Regist. 2006;71:26852–26872.
    1. Aronson RB, Precht WF. Stasis, biological disturbance, and community structure of a Holocene coral reef. Paleobiology. 1997;23:326–346.
    1. Aronson RB, Precht WF. White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia. 2001;460:25–38.