An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011
- PMID: 22834909
- PMCID: PMC3876476
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11324.x
An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011
Erratum in
- BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):524
Abstract
Objective: To update the 2007 Partin tables in a contemporary patient population.
Patients and methods: The study population consisted of 5,629 consecutive men who underwent RP and staging lymphadenectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 1, 2006 and July 30, 2011 and met inclusion criteria. Polychotomous logistic regression analysis was used to predict the probability of each pathologic stage category: organ-confined disease (OC), extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle involvement (SV+), or lymph node involvement (LN+) based on preoperative criteria. Preoperative variables included biopsy Gleason score (6, 3+4, 4+3, 8, and 9-10), serum PSA (0-2.5, 2.6-4.0, 4.1-6.0, 6.1-10.0, greater than 10.0 ng/mL), and clinical stage (T1c, T2c, and T2b/T2c). Bootstrap re-sampling with 1000 replications was performed to estimate 95% confidence intervals for predicted probabilities of each pathologic state.
Results: The median PSA was 4.9 ng/mL, 63% had Gleason 6 disease, and 78% of men had T1c disease. 73% of patients had OC disease, 23% had EPE, 3% had SV+ but not LN+, and 1% had LN+ disease. Compared to the previous Partin nomogram, there was no change in the distribution of pathologic state. The risk of LN+ disease was significantly higher for tumours with biopsy Gleason 9-10 than Gleason 8 (O.R. 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.6). The c-indexes for EPE vs. OC, SV+ vs. OC, and LN+ vs. OC were 0.702, 0.853, and 0.917, respectively. Men with biopsy Gleason 4+3 and Gleason 8 had similar predicted probabilities for all pathologic stages. Most men presenting with Gleason 6 disease or Gleason 3+4 disease have <2% risk of harboring LN+ disease and may have lymphadenectomy omitted at RP.
Conclusions: The distribution of pathologic stages did not change at our institution between 2000-2005 and 2006-2011. The updated Partin nomogram takes into account the updated Gleason scoring system and may be more accurate for contemporary patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.
© 2012 BJU International.
Figures
Comment in
-
What have we learned from the Partin table update?BJU Int. 2013 Jan;111(1):5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2013.11708.x. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23323697 No abstract available.
-
Re: an updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011.J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1320. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.069. Epub 2012 Dec 28. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23561342 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):676-683. doi: 10.1111/bju.13573. Epub 2016 Jul 29. BJU Int. 2017. PMID: 27367645
-
Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17572194 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium.Urology. 2001 Dec;58(6):843-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01441-8. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11744442
-
Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.Urol Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;28(3):491-8. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70157-9. Urol Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11590808 Review.
-
Combined modality staging of prostate carcinoma and its utility in predicting pathologic stage and postoperative prostate specific antigen failure.Urology. 1997 Mar;49(3A Suppl):23-30. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00165-9. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9123732 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of an Indian nomogram for predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.Indian J Urol. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):65-71. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_200_20. Epub 2021 Jan 1. Indian J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33850358 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging biomarkers in prostate cancer: role of PET/CT and MRI.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Apr;42(4):644-55. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2982-5. Epub 2015 Jan 17. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25595344 Review.
-
International Multi-Site Initiative to Develop an MRI-Inclusive Nomogram for Side-Specific Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 27;13(11):2627. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112627. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34071842 Free PMC article.
-
[Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].Urologe A. 2018 Sep;57(9):1048-1057. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0729-9. Urologe A. 2018. PMID: 30054677 Review. German.
-
Germline variants in IL4, MGMT and AKT1 are associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality: An analysis of 12,082 prostate cancer cases.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Jun;21(2):228-237. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0029-2. Epub 2018 Jan 3. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018. PMID: 29298992 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter HB, et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1993;150:110–14. - PubMed
-
- Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA. 1997;277:1445–51. - PubMed
-
- Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology. 2001;58:843–8. - PubMed
-
- Yu JB, Makarov DV, Sharma R, Peschel RE, Partin AW, Gross CP. Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample. J Urol. 2010;183:105–11. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous