Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;207(3):218.e1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Customized estimated fetal weight: a novel antenatal tool to diagnose abnormal fetal growth

Affiliations

Customized estimated fetal weight: a novel antenatal tool to diagnose abnormal fetal growth

Benjamin A Kase et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to apply customized standards to ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (EFW), and assess the frequency of abnormal growth when compared to population-based standards. We also evaluated association with adverse perinatal outcomes.

Study design: This was a historical cohort using prenatal ultrasound examination data at ≥24 weeks over a 1-year period. Ultrasound-derived EFW and growth percentile (population-based EFW [popEFW]) were reported and compared to a customized EFW (custEFW).

Results: In all, 782 women met inclusion criteria. More fetuses were identified as small for gestational age (SGA) (15.1% vs 3.8%; P < .0001) and large for gestational age (LGA) (6.8% vs 1.7%; P < .0001) using custEFW, and adverse perinatal outcomes were more frequent among those identified by the custEFW compared to the popEFW. Both SGA and LGA diagnosed by custEFW were predictive of a neonatal SGA (positive likelihood ratio, 8.64) and LGA (positive likelihood ratio, 15.4).

Conclusion: CustEFW was a better predictor of abnormal birthweight and adverse outcomes compared to traditional popEFW standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types