Influence of compensator thickness, field size, and off-axis distance on the effective attenuation coefficient of a cerrobend compensator for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
- PMID: 22835650
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.06.001
Influence of compensator thickness, field size, and off-axis distance on the effective attenuation coefficient of a cerrobend compensator for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can be performed by using compensators. To make a compensator for an IMRT practice, it is required to calculate the effective attenuation coefficient (μ(eff)) of its material, which is affected by various factors. We studied the effect of the variation of the most important factors on the calculation of the μ(eff) of the cerrobend compensator for 6-MV photon beams, including the field size, compensator thickness, and off-axis distance. Experimental measurements were carried out at 100 cm source-to-surface distance and 10 cm depth for the 6-MV photon beams of an Elekta linac using various field size, compensator thickness, and off-axis settings. The field sizes investigated ranged from 4 × 4 to 25 × 25 cm² and the cerrobend compensator thicknesses from 0.5-6 cm. For a fixed compensator thickness, variation of the μ(eff) with the field size ranged from 3.7-6.8%, with the highest value attributed to the largest compensator thickness. At the reference field size of 10 × 10 cm², the μ(eff) varied by 16.5% when the compensator thickness was increased from 0.5-6 cm. However, the variation of the μ(eff) with the off-axis distance was only 0.99% at this field size, whereas for the largest field size, it was more significant. Our results indicated that the compensator thickness and field size have the most significant effect on the calculation of the compensator μ(eff) for the 6-MV photon beam. Therefore, it is recommended to consider these parameters when calculating the compensator thickness for an IMRT practice designed for these beams. The off-axis distance had a significant effect on the calculation of the μ(eff) only for the largest field size. Hence, it is recommended to consider the effect of this parameter only for field sizes larger than 25 × 25 cm².
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Feb;184(2):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1743-4. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008. PMID: 18259698
-
EBT GAFCHROMIC(TM) film dosimetry in compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy.Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 3. Med Dosim. 2013. PMID: 23290715
-
Inclusion of compensator-induced scatter and beam filtration in pencil beam dose calculations.Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):2896-904. doi: 10.1118/1.2219777. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 16964866
-
Improved dose homogeneity in the breast using tissue compensators.Radiother Oncol. 1991 Dec;22(4):248-51. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(91)90158-d. Radiother Oncol. 1991. PMID: 1792316 Review.
-
A literature review and novel theoretical approach on the optical properties of whole blood.Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Mar;29(2):453-79. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1446-7. Lasers Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24122065 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cobalt compensator-based IMRT device: A treatment planning study of head and neck cases.Phys Med. 2023 Feb;106:102526. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102526. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Phys Med. 2023. PMID: 36621080 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of Clarkson's Method for Calculating Absorbed Dose under Compensator Filters used in Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy.J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020 Oct 1;10(5):575-582. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.858. eCollection 2020 Oct. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020. PMID: 33134216 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials