Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases
- PMID: 22837593
- PMCID: PMC3401720
- DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.97586
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases
Abstract
Introduction: A novel single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy approach is described in this study. We have designed a randomised comparative study in order to elucidate any possible differences between the standard treatment and this novel technique.
Materials and methods: Between July 2009 and March 2010, 140 adult patients with gallbladder pathologies were enrolled in this multicentre study. Two surgeons (RV and UB) randomised patients to either a standard laparoscopic (SL) approach group or to an SPA cholecystectomy group. Two types of trocars were used for this study: the TriPort™ and the SILS™ Port. Outcomes including blood loss, operative time, complications, length of stay and pain were recorded.
Results: There were 69 patients in the SPA group and 71 patients in the SL group. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 (17-77) for the SPA group and 42.6 (19-70) for the SL group. The mean operative time was 63.9 min in the SPA group and 58.4 min in the SL group. For one patient, the SPA procedure was converted to a standard laparoscopic technique and to open approach in the SL group. Complications occurred in eight patients: Five seromas (two in the SPA group) and three hernias (one in the SPA group).The mean hospital stay was 38.5 h in the SPA group and 24.1 h in the SL group. Pain was evaluated and was 2 in the SPA and 2.9 in the SL group, according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) after 24 h (P<0.001). The degree of satisfaction was higher in the SPA group (8.3 versus 6.7). Similar results were found for the aesthetic result (8.8 versus 7.5). (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be feasible and safe. When technical difficulties arise, early conversion to a standard laparoscopic technique is advised to avoid serious complications. The SPA approach can be undertaken without the expense of additional operative time and provides patients with minimal scarring. The cosmetic results and the degree of satisfaction appear to be significant for the SPA approach.
Keywords: Cholecystectomy; single port access; single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a preliminary study in 37 patients with gallbladder disease.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):495-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0424. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009. PMID: 19630589
-
[Single-port access cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison of single-port access versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy].Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Feb;138(1):70-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283886. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Zentralbl Chir. 2013. PMID: 22426970 German.
-
Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23435700 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative analysis of the four-port and three-port trocar access of the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy--review of the literature.Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013;(3):26-38. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013. PMID: 24459764 Review. Bulgarian, English.
-
[Laparoscopic transumbilical cholecystectomy. Results with the gel device and literature review].Cir Esp. 2010 May;87(5):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 9. Cir Esp. 2010. PMID: 20381796 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Experience of single-incision laparoscopy in children.J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):245-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169977. J Minim Access Surg. 2016. PMID: 27279396 Free PMC article.
-
Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION).Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):14-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5717-4. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28726142
-
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8. Epub 2015 Apr 7. Hernia. 2016. PMID: 25846740 Review.
-
Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 24;11(6):e045568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045568. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34168025 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Open Sci. 2022 Aug 18;10:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.08.003. eCollection 2022 Oct. Surg Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 36132940 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lukovich P, Kupcsulik P. NOTES and other minimally invasive surgical techniques (hybrid NOTES, NOTUS, SPS, SILS), and their effect on surgical approaches. Magy Seb. 2009;62:113–9. - PubMed
-
- Giday SA, Kantsevoy SV, Kalloo AN. Principle and history of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15:373–7. - PubMed
-
- Seven R, Barbaros U. Needloscopy-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:61–3. - PubMed
-
- Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Peretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: Report of trans luminal Cholescystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823–6. - PubMed
-
- Zehetner J, Wayand WU. Notes-A new era? Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources