Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 28:12:96.
doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-96.

Evaluation of patient satisfaction of an outpatient gastroscopy service in an Asian tertiary care hospital

Affiliations

Evaluation of patient satisfaction of an outpatient gastroscopy service in an Asian tertiary care hospital

Najib Azmi et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: There are limited published studies on patient satisfaction towards endoscopy from Asian countries. Different methods of evaluation of patient satisfaction may yield different results and there is currently no study to compare results of on-site versus phone-back interviews.

Method: On-site followed by phone-back interviews were carried out on consecutive patients attending the outpatient gastroscopy service of University of Malaya Medical Centre between July 2010 and January 2011 using the modified Group Health Association of America-9 (mGHAA-9) questionnaire. The question on technical skill of endoscopist was replaced with a question on patient comfort during endoscopy.

Results: Seven hundred patients were interviewed. Waiting times for appointment and on gastroscopy day, and discomfort during procedure accounted for over 90% of unfavorable responses. Favorable response diminished to undesirable level when waiting times for appointment and on gastroscopy day exceeded 1 month and 1 hour, respectively. Satisfaction scores were higher for waiting time for appointment but lower for personal manner of nurses/staff and explanation given during phone-back interview. There was no significant difference in satisfaction scores for other questions, including overall rating between the two methods.

Conclusion: Waiting times and discomfort during procedure were main causes for patient dissatisfaction. Phone-back interview may result in different scores for some items compared with on-site interview and should be taken into account when comparing results using the different methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient responses for questions Q1 to Q7.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pareto chart showing the contribution of each of the questions to unfavorable responses. The bars represent the number of unfavorable responses for each of the questions Q1 to Q6 (total number of unfavorable responses = 732). The black line represents the cumulative percentage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient responses towards waiting time for appointment across the different duration of waiting time.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patient responses towards waiting time at Endoscopy Suite across the different duration of waiting time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Reasons for unsuccessful phone-back interview.

References

    1. Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH. et al.Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:S3–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsen IK, Grotmol T, Bretthauer M. et al.Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:850–855. - PubMed
    1. Davis MS. Variation in patients' compliance with doctors' orders: medical practice and doctor-patient interaction. Psychiatry Med. 1971;2:31–54. doi: 10.2190/KMPK-19TA-GEK8-BFTM. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kasteler J, Kane RL, Olsen DM. et al.Issues underlying prevalence of "doctor-shopping" behavior. J Health Soc Behav. 1976;17:329–339. - PubMed
    1. Vaccarino JM. Malpractice Theproblem in perspective. . JAMA. 1977;238:861–863. doi: 10.1001/jama.1977.03280090025014. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources