Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;86(6):716-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms

Abbey B Berenson et al. Contraception. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of two different interventions on oral contraception (OC) adherence and condom use.

Study design: A total of 1,155 women 16-24 years of age requesting OC were randomized to receive either face-to-face behavioral counseling and education at their baseline clinic visit (C group; n=383) or this same intervention followed by monthly phone calls for 6 months (C+P group; n=384) or standard care (S group; n=388). Phone interviews at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit as well as a medical record review assessed OC continuation, condom use and several other secondary and clinically meaningful outcomes such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates and correct use of pills.

Results: The interventions did not have a significant effect on OC continuation after 3 (C+P: 58%; C: 50%; S: 55%), 6 (39%; 32%; 37%) or 12 months (20%; 18%; 20%) (p>.05). Condom use at last sexual intercourse did not differ by intervention methods (p>.05). Moreover, no effect was observed on pregnancy [S=48 (12.4%), C =63 (16.5%), C+P=52 (13.5%); p=.22] and STI [S=18 (4.6%), C=12 (3.1%), C+P=13 (3.4%); p=.50] rates, and mean number of correctly used pill packs (p=.06). However, those randomized to C+P were more likely than C and S patients to identify a cue and report that the cue worked as a reminder to take their OC on time based on 3 and 6 months follow-up information (p<.01 for all relationships).

Conclusions: Neither intervention in this study improved OC adherence among young women.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00584038.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Total number of women recruited and followed at 3, 6, and 12 months by intervention group
DC=Discontinued; mo=month; S=Standard clinic practice; C=Clinic-based intervention; C+P= Clinic-based intervention with phone reinforcement.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Participants with correct oral contraceptive use by intervention
Based on initial number of participants in each intervention group S=Standard clinic practice (n=388); C=Clinic-based intervention (n=383); C+P=Clinic-based intervention with phone reinforcement (n=384).

References

    1. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM. Contraceptive use among adolescent mothers at 6 months postpartum. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:999–1005. - PubMed
    1. Wiemann CM, Berenson AB. An investigation into why adolescents may reject Norplant. Pediatrics. 1996;97:185–91. - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS. Oral contraceptive discontinuation: a prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:577–82. - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:89–92. 104. - PubMed
    1. Oakley D, Potter L, de Leon-Wong E, Visness C. Oral contraceptive use and protective behavior after missed pills. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997;29:277–9. 87. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data