Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;143(5):1261-1265.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.105. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list

Affiliations

An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list

Jennifer Cindy Lai et al. Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background & aims: We aimed to characterize offers of organs to candidates awaiting liver transplantation (LT).

Methods: We analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry on all US LT candidates with nonfulminant disease who were offered livers from February 1, 2005, to January 31, 2010, and ultimately received transplants. We excluded candidates with a final Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of less than 15. Livers were classified as high quality if they were from donors 18-50 years of age who were ≥ 170 cm tall, of non-black race, suffered brain death secondary to trauma, hepatitis C antibody-negative, not categorized as high risk by the Centers for Disease Control, and locally or regionally located.

Results: Of 33,389 candidates for LT, 20% died or were removed from the list and 64% received LT; the median (interquartile range) number of liver offers for all candidates was 5 (range, 2-12). Of those who died or were removed from the list, 84% received 1 or more liver offers. Overall, 55% of those who died or were removed from the list, and 57% of those who received LT, received 1 or more offers of a high-quality liver when they had Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 15 or greater (P = .005). However, the proportion of last liver offers of high quality to patients who underwent LT was twice that of patients who died or were removed from the list (28% vs 14%; P < .001). Most liver offers (68%) were refused for reasons related to donor quality.

Conclusions: Most candidates for LT who died or were removed from the list received 1 or more offers of a liver beforehand, and 55% received 1 or more offers of a high-quality liver. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of wait-list mortality results in part from declined livers, rather than lack of opportunity, for transplantation. Understanding the real-time factors involved in the complex decision to accept a liver offer is vital to reducing wait-list mortality for LT candidates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by Gastroenterology.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Reasons for refusal of all versus high quality liver offers. Livers were defined as high quality if they were from donors between the ages of 18 and 50 years old, ≥170 cm in height, of non-black race, suffered brain death secondary to trauma, HCV-antibody negative, not CDC high risk, and locally or regionally located.

Comment in

References

    1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. [Accessed July 8, 2011];Policy 3.6: Allocation of Livers. http://optntransplanthrsagov/PoliciesandBylaws2/policies/pdfs/policy_8pdf.
    1. Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, Biggins SW, Kalbfleisch JD, Pomfret EA, Sharma P, et al. Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation. Am J Transplant. 2009 Apr;9(4 Pt 2):970–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, Dykstra DM, Punch JD, DebRoy MA, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006 Apr;6(4):783–90. - PubMed
    1. Thuluvath PJ, Guidinger MK, Fung JJ, Johnson LB, Rayhill SC, Pelletier SJ. Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):1003–19. - PubMed
    1. Berenguer M, Prieto M, San Juan F, Rayon JM, Martinez F, Carrasco D, et al. Contribution of donor age to the recent decrease in patient survival among HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Hepatology. 2002 Jul;36(1):202–10. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms