Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;9(9):853-4.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2115.

Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination

Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination

Sjors H W Scheres et al. Nat Methods. 2012 Sep.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The prevention of overfitting
Tests with three cryo-EM data sets (GroEL, β-galactosidase and hepatitis B) illustrate that overfitting may be avoided without compromising resolution. FSCs between reconstructions from random halves of the data (solid lines) and FSCs between the reconstruction from all particles and the crystal structures (dashed lines) show that the gold-standard procedure (black) does not yield lower resolutions, while the conventional procedure (grey) over-estimates resolution (left column). The frequency where the dashed lines pass through FSC=0.5 indicate the true resolution of the reconstructions from all particles, whereas the frequency where the solid lines pass through FSC=0.143 indicate the reported resolution. Corresponding values are given in Supplementary Table 1. Central slices through the reconstructions for the gold-standard procedure show less noisy maps with fewer artefacts (middle column) than for the conventional procedure (right column). Scale bars (white) correspond to 100 Å.

References

    1. Henderson R, et al. Structure. 2012;20:205–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saxton WO, Baumeister W. J. Microscopy. 1982;127:127–138. - PubMed
    1. Stewart A, Grigorieff N. Ultramicroscopy. 2004;102:67–84. - PubMed
    1. Scheres SH. J. Mol. Biol. 2012;415:406–418. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henderson R, et al. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;413:1028–1046. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms