Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;8(8):855-62.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss084. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

DAT by perceived MC interaction on human prefrontal activity and connectivity during emotion processing

Affiliations

DAT by perceived MC interaction on human prefrontal activity and connectivity during emotion processing

Paolo Taurisano et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Maternal care (MC) and dopamine modulate brain activity during emotion processing in inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), striatum and amygdala. Reuptake of dopamine from the synapse is performed by the dopamine transporter (DAT), whose abundance is predicted by variation in its gene (DAT 3'VNTR; 10 > 9-repeat alleles). Here, we investigated the interaction between perceived MC and DAT 3'VNTR genotype on brain activity during processing of aversive facial emotional stimuli.

Methods: Sixty-one healthy subjects were genotyped for DAT 3'VNTR and categorized in low and high MC individuals. They underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a task requiring gender discrimination of facial stimuli with angry, fearful or neutral expressions.

Results: An interaction between facial expression, DAT genotype and MC was found in left IFG, such that low MC and homozygosity for the 10-repeat allele are associated with greater activity during processing of fearful faces. This greater activity was also inversely correlated with a measure of emotion control as scored with the Big Five Questionnaire. Moreover, MC and DAT genotype described a double dissociation on functional connectivity between IFG and amygdala.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that perceived early parental bonding may interact with DAT 3'VNTR genotype in modulating brain activity during emotionally relevant inputs.

Keywords: amygdala; dopamine; emotion; fMRI; inferior frontal gyrus; maternal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means ± 0.95 confidence interval indicating the interaction between facial expression and MC on RTs. Although subjects with HMC have faster RTs during processing of fearful compared with angry faces, subjects with LMC do not present this difference. See text for statistics.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Main effect of MC on BOLD fMRI responses averaged between angry-neutral and fearful neutral contrast in bilateral caudate and left putamen, where subjects with LMC have greater activity. (A) Axial section; (B) Coronal section; (C) Parameter estimates extracted from the cluster with Talairach coordinates, x = −19, y = 7; z = −7; (D) Parameter estimates extracted from the cluster with Talairach coordinates, x = 26, y = 4; z = −7.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Rendered image of the brain showing the cluster in left IFG with a three-way interaction between MC, DAT genotype and facial expression (BA 45; x = −56; y = 26; z = 6). See text for statistics. (B) BOLD response extracted from the IFG cluster depicted in (A). X-axis: DAT 3′ VNTR genotype for each emotional stimulus investigated (i.e. fearful and angry faces). The bars represent 0.95 confidence interval.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Coronal (A) and axial (B) sections of the brain showing the cluster in left amygdala (x = −30, y = −4, z = −22) where an interaction between DAT 3′VNTR genotype and MC was found on PPI with the IFG. (C) PPI values extracted from the cluster in left amygdala shown in (A) and (B). The bars represent 0.95 confidence interval.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scatterplot showing a negative correlation between BOLD signal change in IFG and BFQ emotion control scores in LMC subjects. See text for statistics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16:7678–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badgaiyan RD, Fischman AJ, Alpert NM. Dopamine release during human emotional processing. Neuroimage. 2009;47:2041–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartels M, Saviouk V, de Moor MH, et al. Heritability and genome-wide linkage scan of subjective happiness. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2010;13:135–42. - PubMed
    1. Bertolino A, Arciero G, Rubino V, et al. Variation of human amygdala response during threatening stimuli as a function of 5'HTTLPR genotype and personality style. Biological Psychiatry. 2005;57:1517–25. - PubMed
    1. Bertolino A, Blasi G, Latorre V, et al. Additive effects of genetic variation in dopamine regulating genes on working memory cortical activity in human brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:3918–22. - PMC - PubMed

Substances