Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Nov;44(11):2165-71.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182629215.

Are mechanics different between male and female runners with patellofemoral pain?

Richard W Willy  1 , Kurt T Manal, Erik E Witvrouw, Irene S Davis
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Are mechanics different between male and female runners with patellofemoral pain?

Richard W Willy et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) has often been attributed to abnormal hip and knee mechanics in females. To date, there have been few investigations of the hip and knee mechanics of males with PFP. The purpose of this study was to compare the lower extremity mechanics and alignment of male runners with PFP with healthy male runners and female runners with PFP. We hypothesized that males with PFP would move with greater varus knee mechanics compared with male controls and compared with females with PFP. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that males with PFP would demonstrate greater varus alignment.

Methods: A gait and single-leg squat analysis was conducted on each group (18 runners per group). Measurement of each runner's tibial mechanical axis was also recorded. Motion data were processed using Visual 3D (C-Motion, Bethesda, MD). ANOVAs were used to analyze the data.

Results: Males with PFP ran and squatted in greater peak knee adduction and demonstrated greater peak knee external adduction moment compared with healthy male controls. In addition, males with PFP ran and squatted with less peak hip adduction and greater peak knee adduction compared with females with PFP. The static measure of mechanical axis of the tibial was not different between groups. However, a post hoc analysis revealed that males with PFP ran with greater peak tibial segmental adduction.

Conclusion: Males with PFP demonstrated different mechanics during running and during a single-leg squat compared with females with PFP and with healthy males. Based upon the results of this study, therapies for PFP may need to be sex specific.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest among any of the authors of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement of the Tibial Mechanical Axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hip kinematics during running. Error bars correspond to ±1 standard deviation. a) Contralateral pelvic drop (CPD). Note increased CPD for both males with PFP and females with PFP compared with male controls; b) Hip adduction (HADD). Note increased values for females with PFP only; c) Hip internal rotation (HIR): There were no differences between the 3 groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frontal Plane knee mechanics during running. Error bars correspond to ±1 standard deviation. a) Knee adduction (KADD) and b) external KADD moment. Note that males with PFP ran in greatest peak KADD and, reflecting that alignment, Males with PFP ran with the greater peak KADD moment than control males, but not significantly different that females with PFP.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barrios J, Davis IS, Higginson JS, Royer T. Lower extremity walking mechanics of young Individuals with asymptomatic varus knee alignment. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(11):1414–1419. - PubMed
    1. Barrios J, Crossley K, Davis I. Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment. Journal of Biomech. 2010;43(11):2208–2213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besier TF, Gold GE, Delp SL, Fredericson M, Beaupre GS. The influence of femoral internal and external rotation on cartilage stresses within the patellofemoral joint. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(12):1627–1635. - PubMed
    1. Brinkley J, Stratford P, Lott S, Riddle D. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties and clinical application. Phys Ther. 1999;79(4):371–383. - PubMed
    1. Dempster WT, Gabel WC, Felts WJ. The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject. Am. J.Phys. Anthropol. 1959;17:289–317. - PubMed

Publication types