Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:908:181-95.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-956-3_17.

Reducing the effect of variable starch levels in biomass recalcitrance screening

Affiliations

Reducing the effect of variable starch levels in biomass recalcitrance screening

Stephen R Decker et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2012.

Abstract

Cell wall recalcitrance is the largest contributor to the high expense of lignocellulose conversion to biofuels (Himmel ME et al., Science 315:804-807, 2007). In response to this problem, researchers at the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) are working to determine the contributing factors of biomass recalcitrance. The primary approach to this is screening large sample sets of genetic and environmental variants of model and feedstock plant species for differences in recalcitrance to combined hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis (Decker S et al., BioEnergy Res 2:179-192, 2009). To handle these large sample sets (up to several thousand samples per set), the BESC has developed high throughput screening systems to evaluate both cell wall composition and recalcitrance (Selig MJ et al., Biotechnol Lett 33:961-967, 2011; Selig MJ et al., Ind Biotechnol 6, 104-111, 2010). Molecular beam mass spectroscopy and high throughput, 2-stage acid hydrolysis are used to determine amounts and ratios of cell wall components such as lignin, cellulose, and xylan. Recalcitrance is measured by glucose and xylose release after high throughput hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification, screening large numbers (up to 1,000 s per week) of biomass samples (Selig MJ et al., Ind Biotechnol 6, 104-111, 2010; Sykes R et al., Methods Mol Biol 581, 169-183, 2009). Implementation of these high throughput techniques revealed additional concerns when screening biomass samples for recalcitrance, principal among these was the contribution of starch to glucose release quantitation in both compositional analysis and recalcitrance screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources