Odor recognition memory: two encoding trials are better than one
- PMID: 22843762
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs060
Odor recognition memory: two encoding trials are better than one
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to determine the effect of one versus two encoding trials in the classical yes/no recognition memory paradigm using olfactory stimuli. A group of 24 young adults rated 18 standard microencapsulated odorant targets for familiarity (first encoding block) or pleasantness (second encoding block). Once-encoded targets were in only one block and twice-encoded targets were in both, with items counterbalanced across participants. Participants performed a 20-min nonverbal distractor task followed by a yes/no recognition test incorporating 18 additional odors as foils. Memory performance for twice-encoded targets was superior to that for once-encoded targets. For once-encoded targets, performance did not differ between those rated for familiarity versus those rated for pleasantness. Less pleasant odors produced overall better recognition, with a tendency for less familiar odors to produce overall better recognition. There was a tendency for the second encoding trial to have a larger effect for less pleasant or familiar odors than for more pleasant or familiar odors. The main conclusion is that recognition memory for odors is better for items encoded two times than for items encoded only once. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Bad odors stick better than good ones: Olfactory qualities and odor recognition.Exp Psychol. 2009;56(6):375-80. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.375. Exp Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19502198
-
Familiarity influences odor memory stability.Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):754-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0380-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013. PMID: 23341245
-
Congruent sound can modulate odor pleasantness.Chem Senses. 2014 Mar;39(3):215-28. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt070. Epub 2013 Dec 24. Chem Senses. 2014. PMID: 24368256
-
Mapping odor valence in the brain of flies and mice.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 7. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014. PMID: 24492076 Review.
-
An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects.Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:219-41, C1-5. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010. PMID: 19958179 Review.
Cited by
-
Odorant Normative Data for Use in Olfactory Memory Experiments: Dimension Selection and Analysis of Individual Differences.Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 24;7:1267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01267. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27605921 Free PMC article.
-
A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50:bjaf008. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf008. Chem Senses. 2025. PMID: 40062486 Free PMC article.
-
Sleep Fosters Odor Recognition in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder but Not in Typically Developing Children.Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1182. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091182. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36138918 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources