Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;92(2):443-455.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0677-x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: revision of earlier comments

Affiliations

Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: revision of earlier comments

Thed van Leeuwen. Scientometrics. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

In this study the issue of the validity of the argument against the applied length of citation windows in Journal Impact Factors calculations is critically re-analyzed. While previous studies argued against the relatively short citation window of 1-2 years, this study shows that the relative short term citation impact measured in the window underlying the Journal Impact Factor is a good predictor of the citation impact of the journals in the next years to come. Possible exceptions to this observation relate to journals with relatively low numbers of publications, and the citation impact related to publications in the year of publication. The study focuses on five Journal Subject Categories from the science and social sciences, on normal articles published in these journals, in the 2 years 2000 and 2004.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Biochemistry and molecular biology, 2000. b Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Economics, 2000. c Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Information and library science, 2000. d Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Mathematics, 2000. e Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Pathology, 2000
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Biochemistry and molecular biology, 2004. b Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Economics, 2004. c Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Information and library science, 2004. d Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Mathematics, 2004. e Year to year correlations for impact scores per journal class in Pathology, 2004

References

    1. Garfield, E. (1976). Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant? Current contents, February 1976 (Also published in: Essays of an information scientist, 1974–1976, Vol. 2, pp. 419–420). Philadelphia: ISI Press.
    1. Harzing, A.W. (2010). Working with ISI data: Beware of categorisation problems. Retrieved January 16, 2012 from http://www.harzing.com/ISI_categories.htm.
    1. Moed HF, van Leeuwen Th N. Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information’s journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1995;46:461–467. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<461::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-G. - DOI
    1. Moed HF, van Leeuwen Th. Impact factors can mislead. Nature. 1996;381:186. doi: 10.1038/381186a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moed HF, van Leeuwen Th N, Reedijk J. A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation. 1998;54:387–419. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007175. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources