Multi-center evaluation of post-operative morbidity and mortality after optimal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
- PMID: 22844394
- PMCID: PMC3402488
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039415
Multi-center evaluation of post-operative morbidity and mortality after optimal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
Abstract
Purpose: While optimal cytoreduction is the standard of care for advanced ovarian cancer, the related post-operative morbidity has not been clearly documented outside pioneering centers. Indeed most of the studies are monocentric with inclusions over several years inducing heterogeneity in techniques and goals of surgery. We assessed the morbidity of optimal cytoreduction surgery for advanced ovarian cancer within a short inclusion period in 6 referral centers dedicated to achieve complete cytoreduction.
Patients and methods: The 30 last optimal debulking surgeries of 6 cancer centers were included. Inclusion criteria included: stage IIIc- IV ovarian cancer and optimal surgery performed at the site of inclusion. All post-operative complications within 30 days of surgery were recorded and graded using the Memorial secondary events grading system. Student-t, Chi2 and non-parametric statistical tests were performed.
Results: 180 patients were included. There was no demographic differences between the centers. 63 patients underwent surgery including intestinal resections (58 recto-sigmoid resection), 24 diaphragmatic resections, 17 splenectomies. 61 patients presented complications; One patient died post-operatively. Major (grade 3-5) complications requiring subsequent surgeries occurred in 21 patients (11.5%). 76% of patients with a major complication had undergone an ultraradical surgery (P = 0.004).
Conclusion: While ultraradical surgery may result in complete resection of peritoneal disease in advanced ovarian cancer, the associated complication rate is not negligible. Patients should be carefully evaluated and the timing of their surgery optimized in order to avoid major complications.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Schwartz PE. Cytoreductive surgery in the management of ovarian cancer. Oncology. 2008;22:1025–33. - PubMed
-
- Cannistra SA, Bast RC, Jr, Berek JS, Bookman MA, Crum CP, et al. Progress in the management of gynecologic cancer: consensus summary statement. J Clin Oncol. 15;21. 2003. pp. 129s–132s. - PubMed
-
- Omura GA, Brady MF, Homesley HD, Yordan E, Major FJ, et al. Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9(7):1138–50. - PubMed
-
- du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 15. 2009;115(6):1234–44. - PubMed
-
- Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Aletti GD, Bocciolone L, Colombo N, et al. Role of maximal primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer: Surgical and oncological outcomes. Single institution experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(2):259–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
