Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(7):e41704.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041704. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

Mg2+ in the major groove modulates B-DNA structure and dynamics

Affiliations

Mg2+ in the major groove modulates B-DNA structure and dynamics

Marc Guéroult et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of Mg(2+) bound to the DNA major groove on DNA structure and dynamics. The analysis of a comprehensive dataset of B-DNA crystallographic structures shows that divalent cations are preferentially located in the DNA major groove where they interact with successive bases of (A/G)pG and the phosphate group of 5'-CpA or TpG. Based on this knowledge, molecular dynamics simulations were carried out on a DNA oligomer without or with Mg(2+) close to an ApG step. These simulations showed that the hydrated Mg(2+) forms a stable intra-strand cross-link between the two purines in solution. ApG generates an electrostatic potential in the major groove that is particularly attractive for cations; its intrinsic conformation is well-adapted to the formation of water-mediated hydrogen bonds with Mg(2+). The binding of Mg(2+) modulates the behavior of the 5'-neighboring step by increasing the BII (ε-ζ>0°) population of its phosphate group. Additional electrostatic interactions between the 5'-phosphate group and Mg(2+) strengthen both the DNA-cation binding and the BII character of the 5'-step. Cation binding in the major groove may therefore locally influence the DNA conformational landscape, suggesting a possible avenue for better understanding how strong DNA distortions can be stabilized in protein-DNA complexes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Interaction of Mg2+ in the DNA major groove.
The 5′-CpApG-3′ fragment binds Mg2+ in both crystallographic (left) and simulated (right) structures. Mg2+ (green) forms water-mediated hydrogen bonds (gray arrows) with the N7 of both purines and the O6 of the guanine via its first hydration shell (left: oxygen atoms in red; right: explicit water molecules). The phosphate groups of CpA and ApG are in BII and BI conformation, respectively. Owing to the orientation of the O2P-O1P vector in the BII-CpA linkage, an additional hydrogen bond occurs between Mg2+ and O2P (left) in several X-ray structures. For the same reason, Mg2+ remains close to O2P in the simulated structures (right, thin yellow arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2. BI and BII phosphate groups
. The two panels represent two views of the same 5′-CpApG-3′ fragment and highlight the structural differences between BI (p in GpA, circled in blue in the left panel) and BII (p in CpA, circled in red in the right panel) phosphate groups. The orientation of the O1P-O2P vector is roughly perpendicular and parallel to the axis of the double helix in BI and BII, respectively. The O3′ atom points outside the helix in BI whereas it is turned towards the helix center in BII.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distances characterizing the interaction between Mg2+ and DNA during the MD simulations.
The distances between Mg2+ and the electronegative atoms N7(A22 and G23), O6(G23) and O2P(p22) belonging to the p22A22p23G23 fragment were extracted from S1. Mg2+ interacts with A22 and G23 via its first hydration shell for roughly 20 ns, as shown by the values of the distances d(Mg2+ – N7(A22)), d(Mg2+ – N7(G23)), and d(Mg2+ – O6(G23)). O2P(p22) is transitorily close to Mg2+. Short Mg2+ – O2P(A22) distances are associated with p22 in BII (BI in blue, BII in red). Identical interaction patterns are observed in S2 and S3.
Figure 4
Figure 4. ApG step with and without Mg2+.
Superimposition of the average structures of A22pG23 either free of Mg2+ (blue) or binding Mg2+(red). In both cases, this step shows the same structural characteristics (low twist, positive roll and BI phosphate group). ApG is thus ideally adapted to the octahedral structure of hydrated Mg2+.
Figure 5
Figure 5. (ε-ζ) distribution without and with Mg2+ in the DNA major groove.
N is the percentage of snapshots within each (ε-ζ)p22 interval. The distribution of (ε-ζ)p22 values was calculated on two groups of structures extracted from S0–S3. The first group (blue) corresponds to snapshots in which Mg2+ does not interact with the DNA major groove. In the second group (red), Mg2+ binds to the N7 and O6 atoms of A22/G23 through three water-mediated hydrogen bonds. The BII population of the 5′ phosphate group, p22, increases.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Effect of p22 conformational state on Mg2+-p22A22 distances.
The distances between the OP2 and O3′ atoms of p22 and A22 (d(O2P(p22)-N7(A22)), indicated by a dashed red line; (d(O3′ (p22)-N7(A22) by a dashed blue line) depend on the conformational state of p22, represented here by (ε-ζ) p22 values. When Mg2+ interacts with A22 and G23, d(Mg2+-O2P(p22)) (red) and d(Mg2+-O3′ (p22)) (blue) are parallel to d(O2P(p22)-N7(A22)) and d(O3′ (p22)-N7(A22), respectively. The standard deviations for distances are 1.2 Å. The distances were examined on the two groups of structures defined in Figure 5 caption.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Changes in inter-base pair parameters as a function of (ε-ζ) values.
The C21p22A22 average values of roll (°) and twist (°) and their standard deviations (bars) are plotted as a function of the (ε-ζ) values of p22, considering S0–S3. Mg2+-mediated enhancement of the BII population of p22 leads to an increase in the proportion of conformations characterized by negative rolls and high twists.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Egli M. DNA-cation interactions: quo vadis? Chem Biol. 2002;9:277–286. - PubMed
    1. Hud NV, Polak M. DNA-cation interactions: The major and minor grooves are flexible ionophores. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11:293–301. - PubMed
    1. Subirana JA, Soler-Lopez M. Cations as hydrogen bond donors: a view of electrostatic interactions in DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003;32:27–45. - PubMed
    1. Ponomarev SY, Thayer KM, Beveridge DL. Ion motions in molecular dynamics simulations on DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14771–14775. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai Y, Greenfeld M, Travers KJ, Chu VB, Lipfert J, et al. Quantitative and comprehensive decomposition of the ion atmosphere around nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14981–14988. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms