Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(7):e41809.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041809. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

Are trade-offs among species' ecological interactions scale dependent? A test using pitcher-plant inquiline species

Affiliations

Are trade-offs among species' ecological interactions scale dependent? A test using pitcher-plant inquiline species

Jamie M Kneitel. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Trade-offs among species' ecological interactions is a pervasive explanation for species coexistence. The traits associated with trade-offs are typically measured to mechanistically explain species coexistence at a single spatial scale. However, species potentially interact at multiple scales and this may be reflected in the traits among coexisting species. I quantified species' ecological traits associated with the trade-offs expected at both local (competitive ability and predator tolerance) and regional (competitive ability and colonization rate) community scales. The most common species (four protozoa and a rotifer) from the middle trophic level of a pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) inquiline community were used to link species traits to previously observed patterns of species diversity and abundance. Traits associated with trade-offs (competitive ability, predator tolerance, and colonization rate) and other ecological traits (size, growth rate, and carrying capacity) were measured for each of the focal species. Traits were correlated with one another with a negative relationship indicative of a trade-off. Protozoan and rotifer species exhibited a negative relationship between competitive ability and predator tolerance, indicative of coexistence at the local community scale. There was no relationship between competitive ability and colonization rate. Size, growth rate, and carrying capacity were correlated with each other and the trade-off traits: Size was related to both competitive ability and predator tolerance, but growth rate and carrying capacity were correlated with predator tolerance. When partial correlations were conducted controlling for size, growth rate and carrying capacity, the trade-offs largely disappeared. These results imply that body size is the trait that provides the basis for ecological interactions and trade-offs. Altogether, this study showed that the examination of species' traits in the context of coexistence at different scales can contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying community structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean interactions strength (± SE) of each species’ competitive ability (white bars) and predator tolerance (grey bars).
Higher values represent increased strength of that ecological trait. Species sharing a letter were not significantly different from each other based on Bonferroni post hoc tests (P = 0.05). The upper case letters are associated with competitive ability and the lower case letters are associated with predator tolerance. Species abbreviations are: Bo, Bodo sp.; Po, Poterioochromonas sp.; Ci, Colpidium sp.; Co, Colpoda sp.; Hr, Habrotrocha rosa.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scatterplots of measured species’ traits (Competitive Ability [CA], Predator Tolerance [PT], Colonization Rate [Colonization], Size, Growth rate [r], and Carrying capacity [K]).
Bold borders indicate a significant relationship (P<0.05) from Spearman rank correlation, see Results for details. Correlations with competitive ability and predator tolerance address the local scale, and those including colonization address the regional scale. Species abbreviations are: Bo, Bodo sp.; Po, Poterioochromonas sp.; Ci, Colpidium sp.; Co, Colpoda sp.; Hr, Habrotrocha rosa.

References

    1. Tilman D. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos. 1990;58:3–15.
    1. Tilman D. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: A stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10854–10861. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leibold MA. A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am Nat. 1996;147:784–812.
    1. Kneitel JM, Chase JM. Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett. 2004;7:69–80.
    1. Cadotte MW, Mai DV, Jantz S, Collins MD, Keele M, et al. On Testing the Competition-Colonization Trade-Off in a Multispecies Assemblage. Am Nat. 2006;168:704–709. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources