Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 30:11:11.
doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-11-11.

Evaluation of a hospice rapid response community service: a controlled evaluation

Affiliations

Evaluation of a hospice rapid response community service: a controlled evaluation

Claire Butler et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: While most people faced with a terminal illness would prefer to die at home, less than a third in England are enabled to do so with many dying in National Health Service hospitals. Patients are more likely to die at home if their carers receive professional support. Hospice rapid response teams, which provide specialist palliative care at home on a 24/7 on-call basis, are proposed as an effective way to help terminally ill patients die in their preferred place, usually at home. However, the effectiveness of rapid response teams has not been rigorously evaluated in terms of patient, carer and cost outcomes.

Methods/design: The study is a pragmatic quasi-experimental controlled trial. The primary outcome for the quantitative evaluation for patients is dying in their preferred place of death. Carers' quality of life will be evaluated using postal questionnaires sent at patient intake to the hospice service and eight months later. Carers' perceptions of care received and the patient's death will be assessed in one to one interviews at 6 to 8 months post bereavement. Service utilisation costs including the rapid response intervention will be compared to those of usual care.

Discussion: The study will contribute to the development of the evidence base on outcomes for patients and carers and costs of hospice rapid response teams operating in the community.

Trial registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN32119670.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time of service delivery by area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient and carer data collection flow chart for both intervention and control groups, * indicates data collection points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Higginson IJ, Sen-Gupta GJA. Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med. 2000;3(3):287–300. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Townsend J, Frank AO, Fermont D, Dyer S, Karran O, Walgrove A, Piper M. Terminal cancer care and patients’ preference for place of death: a prospective study. BMJ. 1990;301:415–417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6749.415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. 3 Office of National Statistics: Mortality Statistics. Deaths registered in England and Wales, 2010. , ; 2011. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Causes+of+Death.
    1. Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332:515–521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38740.614954.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grande GE, Addington-Hall JM, Todd CJ. Place of death and access to home care services: are certain patient groups at a disadvantage? Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(5):565–579. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00115-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources