Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):475-84.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8363.

Association between endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting and mortality, wound complications, and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG surgery

Judson B Williams  1 , Eric D Peterson, J Matthew Brennan, Art Sedrakyan, Dale Tavris, John H Alexander, Renato D Lopes, Rachel S Dokholyan, Yue Zhao, Sean M O'Brien, Robert E Michler, Vinod H Thourani, Fred H Edwards, Hesha Duggirala, Thomas Gross, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Peter K Smith
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Association between endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting and mortality, wound complications, and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG surgery

Judson B Williams et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: The safety and durability of endoscopic vein graft harvest in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has recently been called into question.

Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting for Medicare patients undergoing CABG surgery in the United States.

Design, setting, and patients: An observational study of 235,394 Medicare patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery between 2003 and 2008 at 934 surgical centers participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) national database. The STS records were linked to Medicare files to allow longitudinal assessment (median 3-year follow-up) through December 31, 2008.

Main outcome measures: All-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures included wound complications and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization.

Results: Based on Medicare Part B coding, 52% of patients received endoscopic vein-graft harvesting during CABG surgery. After propensity score adjustment for clinical characteristics, there were no significant differences between long-term mortality rates (13.2% [12,429 events] vs 13.4% [13,096 events]) and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization (19.5% [18,419 events] vs 19.7% [19,232 events]). Time-to-event analysis for those patients receiving endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting revealed adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for mortality and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.05) for the composite outcome. Endoscopic vein-graft harvesting was associated with lower harvest site wound complications relative to open vein-graft harvesting (3.0% [3654/122,899 events] vs 3.6% [4047/112,495 events]; adjusted HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; P < .001).

Conclusion: Among patients undergoing CABG surgery, the use of endoscopic vein-graft harvesting compared with open vein-graft harvesting was not associated with increased mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted (A) and risk-adjusted (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for death according to endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvest technique among 235,394 North American patients undergoing isolated CABG 2003–2008 A. Unadjusted mortality curve B. Risk-adjusted mortality curve
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted (A) and risk-adjusted (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for death according to endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvest technique among 235,394 North American patients undergoing isolated CABG 2003–2008 A. Unadjusted mortality curve B. Risk-adjusted mortality curve
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unadjusted (A) and risk-adjusted (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization according to endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvest technique among 235,394 North American patients undergoing isolated CABG 2003 to 2008 A. Unadjusted curve for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization B. Risk-adjusted curve for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unadjusted (A) and risk-adjusted (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization according to endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvest technique among 235,394 North American patients undergoing isolated CABG 2003 to 2008 A. Unadjusted curve for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization B. Risk-adjusted curve for the composite outcomes of death, MI, or revascularization
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot displaying hazard ratio point estimates (weighted by study sample size) and 95% confidence intervals for long term mortality from present and recent large observational studies comparing endoscopic and open vein graft harvesting
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Lumsden AB, Eaves FF, 3rd, Ofenloch JC, Jordan WD. Subcutaneous, video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Dec;4(6):771–776. - PubMed
    1. Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, et al. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jul;66(1):26–31. discussion 31-22. - PubMed
    1. Puskas JD, Wright CE, Miller PK, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest in coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Oct;68(4):1509–1512. - PubMed
    1. Shahian D, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1 Suppl):S2–S22. - PubMed
    1. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):235–244. - PubMed

Publication types