Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;61(4):418-21.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-011-0063-2. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)

Affiliations

Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)

V L Deshmukh et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: The success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction.

Objective: For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE(2) gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor.

Study design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Dept of OBGY, GMCH, Aurangabad from July 2005-January 2008. 400 patients at term with a Bishop's score ≤3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive (200 pts) intra-cervical Foley's catheter or PGE(2) gel (200 pts). After 6 h post induction, Bishop's score was noted labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi square test and t test.

Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.56 ± 1.89 and 5.49 ± 1.82 for Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel, respectively, P < 0.001; However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects. Twenty eight cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 37 (18.5%) were performed in Group B (not significant). The induction to delivery interval was 15.32 ± 5.24 h in Group A and 14.2 ± 5.14 h in Group B (P = 0.291). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.

Keywords: Cervical ripening; Foley’s catheter; PGE2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical guidelines for induction of labour, Appendix-E. London: NICE; 2001.
    1. St. Onge RD, Conners GT. Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical PGE2 gel vs. the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:687–690. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90594-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dewan F, Ara AM, Begum A. Foley’s catheter versus prostaeglandin for induction of labour. Singap J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;32:56–63.
    1. Anthony C, Sciscione DO, Helen M, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion vs. intracervical PGE2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:55–59. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70149-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources