Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)
- PMID: 22851824
- PMCID: PMC3295881
- DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0063-2
Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)
Abstract
Aim: The success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction.
Objective: For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE(2) gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor.
Study design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Dept of OBGY, GMCH, Aurangabad from July 2005-January 2008. 400 patients at term with a Bishop's score ≤3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive (200 pts) intra-cervical Foley's catheter or PGE(2) gel (200 pts). After 6 h post induction, Bishop's score was noted labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi square test and t test.
Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.56 ± 1.89 and 5.49 ± 1.82 for Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel, respectively, P < 0.001; However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects. Twenty eight cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 37 (18.5%) were performed in Group B (not significant). The induction to delivery interval was 15.32 ± 5.24 h in Group A and 14.2 ± 5.14 h in Group B (P = 0.291). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no difference between the two groups.
Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.
Keywords: Cervical ripening; Foley’s catheter; PGE2.
Similar articles
-
Topical Dinoprostone vs. Foley's Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cervical Ripening Approaches.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;13(9):983. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090983. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Dec;56(6):578-584. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12489. Epub 2016 Jul 7. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 27385377 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;42(2):232-238. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227. Epub 2021 May 24. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34027782 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jul 12;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1793-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30001195 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of pre and post Foley catheter Bishop's Score: A retrospective record review at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):73-77. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7433. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38196485 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey.BMC Res Notes. 2017 Apr 12;10(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2478-z. BMC Res Notes. 2017. PMID: 28403891 Free PMC article.
-
Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013251. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30508911 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3:CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. PMID: 31623014 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36996264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical Dinoprostone vs. Foley's Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cervical Ripening Approaches.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;13(9):983. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090983. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361762 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical guidelines for induction of labour, Appendix-E. London: NICE; 2001.
-
- Dewan F, Ara AM, Begum A. Foley’s catheter versus prostaeglandin for induction of labour. Singap J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;32:56–63.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources