Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:801495.
doi: 10.1155/2012/801495. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

Secondary primary malignancies in multiple myeloma: an old NEMESIS revisited

Affiliations

Secondary primary malignancies in multiple myeloma: an old NEMESIS revisited

Jay Yang et al. Adv Hematol. 2012.

Abstract

The treatment of myeloma has undergone extraordinary improvements in the past half century. These advances have been accompanied by a concern for secondary primary malignancies (SPMs). It has been known for decades that extended therapy with alkylating chemotherapy agents, such as melphalan, carries an increased risk of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML), with a cumulative risk as high as 10-15%. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support became widely accepted for myeloma in the 1990s. Despite the use of high doses of melphalan, the risk of t-MDS/AML with this procedure is estimated to be less than 5%, with much of this risk attributable to pretransplant therapy. Recently, lenalidomide has come under scrutiny for its possible association with SPMs. It is too soon to declare a causal relationship at this time, but there appears to be an increased number of SPMs in reports from several studies using lenalidomide maintenance. Current studies should be amended and future studies planned to better define the risk of SPMs and the risk factors and mechanisms for its development. Patients should be educated regarding this potential concern but the current use of lenalidomide should not generally be altered until further data are available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Competing risks in multiple myeloma patients. Cumulative incidence of second primary cancers, disease progression, and death for patients randomized to either maintenance lenalidomide or placebo post HDT/SCT in the CALGB 100104 trial. In placebo treated patients (in blue), the risk of death and disease progression far exceeds the risk of SPM. Reprinted with permission [55].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, et al. NIH Publication. 05-5302. Bethesda, Md, USA: National Cancer Institute; 2006 . New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER cancer registries, 1973–2000.
    1. Olivanen T. Acute leukaemia and other secondary neoplasms in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: a Finnish Leukaemia Group study. European Journal of Haematology. 2000;65(2):123–127. - PubMed
    1. Dong C, Hemminki K. Second primary neoplasms among 53 159 haematolymphoproliferative malignancy patients in Sweden, 1958–1996: a search for common mechanisms. British Journal of Cancer. 2001;85(7):997–1005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergsagel DE, Sprague CC, Austin C, Griffith KM. Evaluation of new chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma—IV. L-Phenylalanine mustard (NSC-8806) Cancer Chemotherapy Reports. Part 1. 1962;21:87–99. - PubMed
    1. Hoogstraten B, Sheehe PR, Cuttner J, et al. Melphalan in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1967;30(1):74–83. - PubMed