Does the type of urinary diversion affect the result of distal hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial
- PMID: 22852026
- PMCID: PMC3398600
- DOI: 10.1177/1756287212448111
Does the type of urinary diversion affect the result of distal hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this review is to evaluate different techniques in urinary diversion and urethral stenting in hypospadias surgery.
Patients and methods: The surgical procedure included 192 tubularized incised plate (TIP) repairs for distal penile hypospadias. The patients were prospectively randomized into three groups: In group A, a urethral catheter was used as a stent and for diversion of urine (63 patients); in group B we use no urethral stenting (63 patients), only a suprapubic catheter; and in group C we use a suprapubic diversion and we put a small catheter in the anterior urethra only (66 patients). The urethral catheter was removed in group A at the 6th-7th postoperative day and in group C the urethral stent was removed at the 3rd-4th postoperative day. The suprapubic catheter was removed in both groups B and C at the 7th-9th postoperative day. All patients received an injection of antibiotics in the morning of the operation and daily until the day of catheter removal. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon.
Results: The mean ages of our patients were 3, 5, and 5 years in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (3-8). Follow-up ranged from 8 to 48 months (mean of 21.5 ± 10.1 months). Bladder spasm was observed in 33% of our patients in group A while there were no cases of spasm in the other two groups with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Fistula was reported in eight patients (12.7%) of our urethral catheter group A, while it was observed in three patients (2.3%) of our suprapubic diversion groups B and C with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Meatal stenosis was reported in eight patients in group B (12.7%; nonstented group) versus three patients of both groups A and C (2.4%; stented groups) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Suprapubic diversion is an important step in hypospadias repair as it provides a better success rate with a significantly lower rate of occurrence of fistula. However, the addition of a stent in the anterior urethra to suprapubic diversion avoids the development of meatal stenosis and also avoids the bladder spasm observed with a urethral catheter.
Keywords: diversion; hypospadias; tubularized incised plate.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
A Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Hypospadias Surgery Following Early Versus Late Bladder Catheter Removal.Cureus. 2022 Jun 20;14(6):e26104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26104. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35875280 Free PMC article.
-
[One-stage nonstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for pain and complication after hypospadias repair].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;28(12):1505-8. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25826896 Chinese.
-
Outcome analysis of tubularized incised plate repair in hypospadias: is a catheter necessary?Urol Int. 2013;90(3):354-7. doi: 10.1159/000347127. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Urol Int. 2013. PMID: 23548842
-
Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair: experience at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health.J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Aug;86 Suppl 3:S522-30. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003. PMID: 14700143
-
Meta-analysis of complication rates of the tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 26. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25819601 Review.
Cited by
-
Complications of hypospadias surgery: Experience in a tertiary hospital of a developing country.Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec;12(4):211-6. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.172538. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015. PMID: 26712282 Free PMC article.
-
Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study.World J Urol. 2021 Nov;39(11):4235-4240. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03732-3. Epub 2021 May 26. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34037818
-
A Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Hypospadias Surgery Following Early Versus Late Bladder Catheter Removal.Cureus. 2022 Jun 20;14(6):e26104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26104. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35875280 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate wound healing, cosmetic and functional results as well as postoperative adverse events comparing two types of dressing technique after hypospadias repair.Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 18;41(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06063-1. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025. PMID: 40533580 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Identifying variability in surgical practices and instrumentation for hypospadias repair across the Western Pediatric Urology Consortium (WPUC) network.J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Jun;19(3):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.12.001. Epub 2023 Jan 11. J Pediatr Urol. 2023. PMID: 36775718 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arda I.S., Mahmutoglu M. (2001) Urethral catheterization in hypospadias surgery: Should the device enter the bladder or be made a urethral stent? J Pediatr Surg 36: 1829–1831 - PubMed
-
- Borer J.G., Bauer S.B., Peters C.A., Diamond D.A., Atala A., Cilento B.G., Jr, et al. (2001) Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias. J Urol 165: 581–585 - PubMed
-
- Buson H., Smiley D., Reinberg Y., Gonzalez R. (1994) Distal hypospadias repair without stents: is it better? J Urol 151: 1059–1060 - PubMed
-
- Demirbilek S., Atayurt H.F. (1997) One-stage hypospadias repair with stent or suprapubic diversion: which is better? J Pediatr Surg 32: 1711–1712 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources