Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;2(1):12-5.
doi: 10.2500/ar.2011.2.0003.

Is routine nasoendoscopy warranted in epistaxis patients after removal of nasal packing?

Affiliations

Is routine nasoendoscopy warranted in epistaxis patients after removal of nasal packing?

Tafadzwa P Makarawo et al. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Fiberoptic nasoendoscopy (FNE) is a powerful investigative tool in ear, nose, and throat practice in which its use in the management of epistaxis is varied among clinicians. The practice of assessing the nasal cavity after removal of nasal packs is common but its usefulness has not been evaluated. Therefore, we assessed the benefits of routine FNE after removal of nasal packs in epistaxis patients. Our study was performed retrospectively involving 62 adult patients admitted over a 6-month period between 2005 and 2006. Data regarding the emergent management of epistaxis cases on presentation, the use of FNE, and the final diagnosis and outcome of each patient were specifically investigated during the study. Anterior rhinoscopy was performed in 27 patients at initial presentation, of whom 45% (10/27) had anterior bleeding points identified. FNE examination after removal of nasal packs in eight patients yielded evidence of a posterior bleeding point in only one case (12.5%). Of those patients in whom anterior rhinoscopy revealed no anterior bleeding point at presentation (17/27), 12 patients went on to have FNE after removal of their nasal packs, and of these, 33% (4/12) of patients were found to have a posterior bleeding vessel. Overall, FNE was performed in 24 patients, of whom only 1 (1/24) had an active posterior bleeding vessel needing nasal repacking. Four patients (4/24) had prominent posterior vessels that required no intervention, 1 patient (1/24) had new pathology identified, and in the remaining 18 cases (18/24), FNE yielded no additional information to modify management. The routine performance of FNE in all epistaxis patients after pack removal does not appear to convey any additional benefit. We advocate the use of FNE when anterior bleeding has been excluded or bleeding is persistent and that careful nasal examination by anterior rhinoscopy should be the cornerstone of assessment.

Keywords: Epistaxis; fibreoptic nasendoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to declare pertaining to this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of 62 epistaxis patients by initial examination and diagnosis on admission.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Fiberoptic nasoendoscopy (FNE) findings in patients with anterior bleeding points on anterior rhinoscopy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Fiberoptic nasoendoscopy (FNE) findings in patients with excluded anterior bleeding points on anterior rhinoscopy.

References

    1. Douglas R, Wormold P-J. Update on epistaxis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15:180–183, 2007 - PubMed
    1. Viehweg TL, Roberson JB, Hudson JW. Epistaxis: Diagnosis and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:511–518, 2006 - PubMed
    1. Woodhall NM, Harwood RJ, Barker GL. Complications of awake fibreoptic intubation without sedation in 200 healthy anaesthetists attending a training course. Br J Anaesth 100:850–855, 2008 - PubMed
    1. Winter SCA, Thirwell A, Jervis P. Flexible nasendoscopy with a disposable-sheath system versus standard nasendoscopy: A prospective, randomized trial. Clin Otolaryngol 27:81–83, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Awad Z, Pothier DD. A potential danger of flexible endoscopy sheaths: A detached tip and how to retrieve it. J Laryngol Otol 123:243–244, 2009 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources