Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea
- PMID: 22852456
- DOI: 10.1108/14777261211238981
Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present the role of social values in setting healthcare priorities in Korea.
Design/methodology/approach: Using Clark and Weale's draft framework, Korean healthcare priority setting was analysed. The process values used were transparency, accountability, and participation, and the content values used were clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, justice/equity, solidarity and autonomy.
Findings: In the Korean health priority setting, it was found that multiple factors influence the decision-making process. Effectiveness and safety are the two most important values mentioned in the process. Cost-effectiveness is also considered in reimbursement decisions for new drugs since 2007. Recently, health technology assessment (HTA) has begun to change the social value system traditionally used in the Korean healthcare priority setting.
Originality/value: The paper extends understanding of health priority setting in Korea, and how the interpretation and use of social values has changed over recent years.
Similar articles
-
Social values and health priority setting in Germany.J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):374-83. doi: 10.1108/14777261211239016. J Health Organ Manag. 2012. PMID: 22852459
-
Social values and health priority setting in England: "values" based decision making.J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):363-73. doi: 10.1108/14777261211239007. J Health Organ Manag. 2012. PMID: 22852458
-
Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.Health Policy. 2015 Feb;119(2):127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Health Policy. 2015. PMID: 25267072
-
Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework.J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):293-316. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238954. J Health Organ Manag. 2012. PMID: 22852453 Review.
-
Social value judgments in healthcare: a philosophical critique.J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):317-30. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238963. J Health Organ Manag. 2012. PMID: 22852454 Review.
Cited by
-
The Value Framework Governing Iran's Health System Policy: A Practical Gap.Int J Prev Med. 2022 Jun 24;13:96. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_446_20. eCollection 2022. Int J Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35958361 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare resource allocation decisions affecting uninsured services.J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Nov 21;30(8):1162-1182. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2016-0003. J Health Organ Manag. 2016. PMID: 27934550 Free PMC article.
-
Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks.Health Econ Rev. 2021 Jan 7;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00300-0. Health Econ Rev. 2021. PMID: 33411161 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya.Health Policy Plan. 2023 Jan 6;38(1):49-60. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac099. Health Policy Plan. 2023. PMID: 36373870 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 11;14(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0152-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 27835964 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources