Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug 2:12:594.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-594.

Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres

Christian Napoli  1 , Vincenzo Marcotrigiano, Maria Teresa Montagna
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres

Christian Napoli et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of this study is to assess microbial contamination levels in operating theatres using both an active and a passive sampling method and then to assess if there is a correlation between the results of the two different sampling methods.

Methods: The study was performed in 32 turbulent air flow operating theatres of a University Hospital in Southern Italy. Active sampling was carried out using the Surface Air System and passive sampling with settle plates, in accordance with ISO 14698. The Total Viable Count (TVC) was evaluated at rest (in the morning before the beginning of surgical activity) and in operational (during surgery).

Results: The mean TVC at rest was 12.4 CFU/m3 and 722.5 CFU/m2/h for active and passive samplings respectively. The mean in operational TVC was 93.8 CFU/m3 (SD = 52.69; range = 22-256) and 10496.5 CFU/m2/h (SD = 7460.5; range = 1415.5-25479.7) for active and passive samplings respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the two methods correlate in a comparable way with the quality of air.

Conclusion: It is possible to conclude that both methods can be used for general monitoring of air contamination, such as routine surveillance programs. However, the choice must be made between one or the other to obtain specific information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between the TVC values detected simultaneously by IMA (CFU/m2/h) and SAS (CFU/m3) in 32 operating rooms at rest.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the TVC values detected simultaneously by IMA (CFU/m2/h) and SAS (CFU/m3) in 19 operating rooms in operational.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sehulster L, Chinn RY. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52:1–42. - PubMed
    1. Napoli C, Fasano F, Iatta R, Barbuti G, Cuna C, Montagna MT. Legionella spp. and legionellosis in southeastern Italy: disease epidemiology and environmental surveillance in community and health care facilities. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:660. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-660. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pasquarella C, Veronesi L, Castiglia P, Liguori G, Montagna MT, Napoli C, Rizzetto R, Torre I, Masia MD, Di Onofrio V, Colucci ME, Tinteri C, Tanzi M. Italian multicentre study on microbial environmental contamination in dental clinics: a pilot study. Sc Total Environ. 2010;408:4045–4051. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tseng CC, Chang LY, CS L. Detection of airborne viruses in a pediatrics department measured using real-time qPCR coupled to an air-sampling filter method. J. Environ. Health. 2010;73:22–28. - PubMed
    1. Vescia N, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Osborn JF, Cerquetani F, Cavarischia R, Grillot R, D’Alessandro D. Field validation of a dusting cloth for mycological surveillance of surfaces. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2011;39:156–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources