Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 18;103(2):185-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Mixed exciton-charge-transfer states in photosystem II: Stark spectroscopy on site-directed mutants

Affiliations

Mixed exciton-charge-transfer states in photosystem II: Stark spectroscopy on site-directed mutants

Elisabet Romero et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

We investigated the electronic structure of the photosystem II reaction center (PSII RC) in relation to the light-induced charge separation process using Stark spectroscopy on a series of site-directed PSII RC mutants from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The site-directed mutations modify the protein environment of the cofactors involved in charge separation (P(D1), P(D2), Chl(D1), and Phe(D1)). The results demonstrate that at least two different exciton states are mixed with charge-transfer (CT) states, yielding exciton states with CT character: (P(D2)(δ)(+)P(D1)(δ)(-)Chl(D1)) (673 nm) and (Chl(D1)(δ)(+)Phe(D1)(δ)(-)) (681 nm) (where the subscript indicates the wavelength of the electronic transition). Moreover, the CT state P(D2)(+)P(D1)(-) acquires excited-state character due to its mixing with an exciton state, producing (P(D2)(+)P(D1)(-))(δ) (684 nm). We conclude that the states that initiate charge separation are mixed exciton-CT states, and that the degree of mixing between exciton and CT states determines the efficiency of charge separation. In addition, the results reveal that the pigment-protein interactions fine-tune the energy of the exciton and CT states, and hence the mixing between these states. This mixing ultimately controls the selection and efficiency of a specific charge separation pathway, and highlights the capacity of the protein environment to control the functionality of the PSII RC complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative positions of the central cofactors in the PSII RC complex together with the positions of the mutated residues (D1-Gln130, D1-His198, D2-His197, and D1-Thr179) and the chemical structures of the introduced residues (Glu, Gln, Asn, Ala, and His; adapted from Umena et al. (5), Protein Data Bank ID: 3ARC). Water molecules are depicted in red; for the cofactors, the magnesium atoms are in green; for the residues, carbon atoms are in green, oxygen is in red, and nitrogen is in blue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simultaneously recorded 77 K absorption and Stark spectra for the Synechocystis PCC 6803 RC complex WT and D1-Gln130Glu mutant, and the spinach RC complex WT. Left panel: Chl-Phe QY absorption region (inset: spinach RC WT 681 nm Stark minimum expanded). Right panel: Phe QX absorption region. The absorption and Stark spectra are normalized to the RC content. The Stark spectra were recorded at χ = 54.7° and at an external electric field strength of 2.25 × 105 V cm−1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simultaneously recorded 77 K absorption and Stark spectra of the Synechocystis PCC 6803 core complex in the QY absorption region for the WT, D1-His198Gln, and D2-His197Gln mutants (top left panel); WT, D1-His198Asn, and D2-His197Asn mutants (top-right panel); WT, D1-His198Ala, and D2-His197Ala mutants (bottom-left panel); and WT and D1-Thr179His mutant (bottom right panel). The absorption and Stark spectra are normalized to the cofactor content. The absorption difference spectra have been multiplied by 5 to facilitate visualization. The Stark spectra were recorded at χ = 54.7° and an external electric field strength of 2.25 × 105 V cm−1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zouni A., Witt H.T., Orth P. Crystal structure of photosystem II from Synechococcus elongatus at 3.8 A resolution. Nature. 2001;409:739–743. - PubMed
    1. Ferreira K.N., Iverson T.M., Iwata S. Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science. 2004;303:1831–1838. - PubMed
    1. Loll B., Kern J., Biesiadka J. Towards complete cofactor arrangement in the 3.0 A resolution structure of photosystem II. Nature. 2005;438:1040–1044. - PubMed
    1. Guskov A., Kern J., Saenger W. Cyanobacterial photosystem II at 2.9-A resolution and the role of quinones, lipids, channels and chloride. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:334–342. - PubMed
    1. Umena Y., Kawakami K., Kamiya N. Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature. 2011;473:55–60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms