Cellular bioluminescence imaging
- PMID: 22854570
- DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top070607
Cellular bioluminescence imaging
Erratum in
- Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2012 Sep;2012(9):1028
-
Erratum: Cellular Bioluminescence Imaging.Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016 Mar 1;2016(3):pdb.err091751. doi: 10.1101/pdb.err091751. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016. PMID: 26933240 No abstract available.
Abstract
Bioluminescence imaging of live cells has recently been recognized as an important alternative to fluorescence imaging. Fluorescent probes are much brighter than bioluminescent probes (luciferase enzymes) and, therefore, provide much better spatial and temporal resolution and much better contrast for delineating cell structure. However, with bioluminescence imaging there is virtually no background or toxicity. As a result, bioluminescence can be superior to fluorescence for detecting and quantifying molecules and their interactions in living cells, particularly in long-term studies. Structurally diverse luciferases from beetle and marine species have been used for a wide variety of applications, including tracking cells in vivo, detecting protein-protein interactions, measuring levels of calcium and other signaling molecules, detecting protease activity, and reporting circadian clock gene expression. Such applications can be optimized by the use of brighter and variously colored luciferases, brighter microscope optics, and ultrasensitive, low-noise cameras. This article presents a review of how bioluminescence differs from fluorescence, its applications to cellular imaging, and available probes, optics, and detectors. It also gives practical suggestions for optimal bioluminescence imaging of single cells.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials