Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 31;2(4):e000977.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000977. Print 2012.

A chemical analysis examining the pharmacology of novel psychoactive substances freely available over the internet and their impact on public (ill)health. Legal highs or illegal highs?

Affiliations

A chemical analysis examining the pharmacology of novel psychoactive substances freely available over the internet and their impact on public (ill)health. Legal highs or illegal highs?

Tammy C Ayres et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Public Health England aims to improve the nation's health and acknowledges that unhealthy lifestyles, which include drug use, undermine society's health and well-being. Recreational drug use has changed to include a range of substances sold as 'research chemicals' but known by users as 'legal highs' (legal alternatives to the most popular illicit recreational drugs), which are of an unknown toxicity to humans and often include prohibited substances controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Consequently, the long-term effects on users' health and inconsistent, often illegal ingredients, mean that this group of drugs presents a serious risk to public health both now and in the future. Therefore, the aim of this study was to ascertain what is in legal highs, their legality and safety, while considering the potential impact, these synthetic substances might be having on public health.

Design: A total of 22 products were purchased from five different internet sites, 18 months after the UK ban on substituted cathinones, like mephedrone, was introduced in April 2010. Each substance was screened to determine its active ingredients using accepted analytical techniques.

Setting: The research was conducted in Leicestershire but has implications for the provision of primary and secondary healthcare throughout the UK.

Results: Two products, both sold as NRG-2 from different internet suppliers, were found to contain the banned substituted cathinones 4-methylethcathinone (4-MEC) and 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC), the latter being present in much smaller quantities. Although sold as research chemicals and labelled 'not for human consumption', they are thinly disguised 'legal highs', available online in quantities that vary from 1 g to 1 kg.

Conclusions: Despite amendments to legislation, prohibited class B substances are still readily available in large quantities over the internet. The findings suggest that these prohibited substances are being manufactured or imported into the UK on a large scale, which has serious implications for public health and clinicians who are ill equipped to deal with this newly emerging problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of cathinone (2-amino-1-phenyl-1-propanone).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of the banned substituted cathinone 4-MEC (4-Methylethcathinone).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structure of the banned substituted cathinone 4-MMC or mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone).

References

    1. Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Consideration of the Novel Psychoactive Substances (Legal Highs). London: ACMD, 2011.
    1. International Narcotic Control Board. Annual Report. New York: United Nations, 2011.
    1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Europol 2010 Annual Report on the Implementation of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 2011.
    1. Baron M, Eile M, Eile L. Analysis of legal highs—do they contain what it says on the tin? Drug Test Anal 2011;3:576–81. - PubMed
    1. Brandt SD, Sumnall HR, Measham F, et al. Analyses of second-generation ‘legal highs’ in the UK: initial findings. Drug Test Anal 2010;2:377–82. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources