Panel perception of facial attractiveness
- PMID: 2285698
- DOI: 10.1179/bjo.17.4.299
Panel perception of facial attractiveness
Abstract
The full-face and profile photographic transparencies of 60 subjects (30 male, 30 female) divided equally among Angles Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions, taken before and after orthodontic treatment, were randomly distributed in projector carousels and shown to four panels consisting of orthodontists, dental students, art students, and the parents of children undergoing orthodontic treatment. The faces were rated according to the method of Lundstrom et al. (1987). Full-face views generally were rated more attractive than profile views and Class II and Class III malocclusion subjects were rated lower than Class I malocclusion subjects. While the art student and parent panels were less critical in their appraisal of facial attractiveness, they were less sensitive to the changes brought about by orthodontic treatment than the orthodontist and dental student panels, although all could appreciate an improvement in the Class II Division 1 group.
Comment in
-
Panel perception of facial attractiveness.Br J Orthod. 1991 May;18(2):152-3. doi: 10.1179/bjo.18.2.152a. Br J Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1911697 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Jun;50(6):590-4. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90439-7. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992. PMID: 1593319
-
Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):523-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.016. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29602344
-
Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 May-Jun;17(3):282-6. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.130226. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014. PMID: 24714003
-
The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents.ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Oct 3;2013:903507. doi: 10.1155/2013/903507. eCollection 2013. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. PMID: 24222754 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of Facial Profile: How You Feel About Yourself.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Aug;4(2):109-11. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1092. Epub 2010 Apr 15. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011. PMID: 27672248 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of frontal facial type and sex on preferred chin projection.Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):108-117. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.108. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Korean J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28337420 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Effects of Orthognathic Surgery versus Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment of Convex Facial Profile Patients.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 23;13(1):91. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010091. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202096 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Three-Dimensional Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Normal Pediatric Individuals: A Panel Assessment Outcome Study of Clinicians and Observers.J Clin Med. 2019 May 10;8(5):648. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050648. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31083393 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate: comparing the assessment of laypeople and healthcare professionals.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb 6;41(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0189-1. eCollection 2019 Dec. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30815431 Free PMC article.
-
Facial Attractiveness Assessment using Illustrated Questionnairers.Clujul Med. 2015;88(1):73-8. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-403. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Clujul Med. 2015. PMID: 26528052 Free PMC article.