Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 2:12:26.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-26.

Profiling the clinical presentation of diagnostic characteristics of a sample of symptomatic TMD patients

Affiliations

Profiling the clinical presentation of diagnostic characteristics of a sample of symptomatic TMD patients

Luciana Pimenta e Silva Machado et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients might present a number of concurrent clinical diagnoses that may be clustered according to their similarity. Profiling patients' clinical presentations can be useful for better understanding the behavior of TMD and for providing appropriate treatment planning. The aim of this study was to simultaneously classify symptomatic patients diagnosed with a variety of subtypes of TMD into homogenous groups based on their clinical presentation and occurrence of comorbidities.

Methods: Clinical records of 357 consecutive TMD patients seeking treatment in a private specialized clinic were included in the study sample. Patients presenting multiple subtypes of TMD diagnosed simultaneously were categorized according to the AAOP criteria. Descriptive statistics and two-step cluster analysis were used to characterize the clinical presentation of these patients based on the primary and secondary clinical diagnoses.

Results: The most common diagnoses were localized masticatory muscle pain (n = 125) and disc displacement without reduction (n = 104). Comorbidity was identified in 288 patients. The automatic selection of an optimal number of clusters included 100% of cases, generating an initial 6-cluster solution and a final 4-cluster solution. The interpretation of within-group ranking of the importance of variables in the clustering solutions resulted in the following characterization of clusters: chronic facial pain (n = 36), acute muscle pain (n = 125), acute articular pain (n = 75) and chronic articular impairment (n = 121).

Conclusion: Subgroups of acute and chronic TMD patients seeking treatment can be identified using clustering methods to provide a better understanding of the clinical presentation of TMD when multiple diagnosis are present. Classifying patients into identifiable symptomatic profiles would help clinicians to estimate how common a disorder is within a population of TMD patients and understand the probability of certain pattern of clinical complaints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Initial and alternative cluster solutions for interpretation of the patients’ symptomatic profiles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okeson JP, editor. American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Orofacial pain: guidelines for assessment, diagnosis and management. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago; 1996.
    1. Okeson JP. The classification of orofacial pains. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2008;20:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.12.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laskin DM. The clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders in the orthodontic patient. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:197–206. doi: 10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80051-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Machado LPS, Nery CG, Leles CR, Nery MBM, Okeson JP. The prevalence of clinical diagnostic groups in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2009;27:194–199. - PubMed
    1. Durham J, Steele J, Moufti MA, Wassell R, Robinson P, Exley C. Temporomandibular disorder patients’ journey through care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39:532–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00608.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms