doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.003.
Epub 2012 Jun 29.
[Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?]
[Article in
German]
Affiliations
- PMID: 22857725
- DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.003
Item in Clipboard
[Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?]
[Article in
German]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes.
2012.
Abstract
A personal view of a stubborn opponent of rationing: why my conscience is fine with refraining from rationing but not from conducting research on prioritisation.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Similar articles
-
[Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22857730 German.
-
[What kind of debate on prioritisation do we need for the benefit of our health system and society?].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22857723 German.
-
[In focus: allocation in health care. Ideal distribution of resources].Pflege Z. 2014 May;67(5):308-11. Pflege Z. 2014. PMID: 24868711 German. No abstract available.
-
[Prioritisation in the German health care system--an issue in ophthalmology?].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Mar;226(3):154-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109173. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009. PMID: 19294585 Review. German.
-
[The role of economics in fair rationing].Chirurg. 2012 Oct;83(10):908-13. doi: 10.1007/s00104-012-2285-y. Chirurg. 2012. PMID: 22915227 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
