Cross-reactive gut-directed immune response against Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A and B in typhoid fever and after oral Ty21a typhoid vaccination

Abstract

Background: There are no vaccines against paratyphoid fever in clinical use. The disease has become more wide-spread and there is a growing problem of antibiotic resistance among the strains. Previous reports suggest that the oral live Salmonella Typhi Ty21a-vaccine confers protection against paratyphoid B fever. Data on efficacy against paratyphoid A fever are somewhat contentious. The present study investigated the immunological basis for such efficacy reports at a single-cell level: plasmablasts (identified as antibody-secreting cells, ASC) were studied for secretion of antibodies cross-reactive with Salmonella Paratyphi in the circulation of patients with enteric fever and of volunteers vaccinated with Ty21a.

Materials and methods: Thirty volunteers immunized with Ty21a and five patients with enteric fever were investigated for Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A/B/C-specific circulating plasmablasts. PBMC were sorted by their expression of homing receptors (HR) for the intestine (α4β7), peripheral lymph node (l-selectin) and skin (CLA) and typhoid- and paratyphoid-specific plasmablasts were enumerated with ELISPOT.

Results: Before vaccination, no cross-reactive ASC were found in the volunteers. In addition to the Salmonella Typhi-specific response, a significant cross-reactive immune response was mounted against Salmonella Paratyphi A and B both in the patients and the vaccinees. The magnitude of the response increased in the order Salmonella Paratyphi A (median 30 ASC/10(6) PBMC)→Salmonella Paratyphi B (median 81)→Salmonella Typhi (median 301) in the vaccinees. Both in patients and in vaccinees, the homing receptor (HR) selection favored homing to the gut, indicating a humoral intestinal immune response.

Conclusions: These immunological data provide evidence consistent with previous reports describing certain levels of cross-protective efficacy of Ty21a against paratyphoid fever. Controlled studies are needed to evaluate cross-protective efficacy. In the current situation where paratyphoid fever is emerging and no vaccines are available, any level of cross-protective capacity is valuable.