Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 22859911
- PMCID: PMC3409130
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001275
Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: People with cancer are known to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this risk is believed to vary according to cancer type, stage of disease, and treatment modality. Our purpose was to summarise the existing literature to determine precisely and accurately the absolute risk of VTE in cancer patients, stratified by malignancy site and background risk of VTE.
Methods and findings: We searched the Medline and Embase databases from 1 January 1966 to 14 July 2011 to identify cohort studies comprising people diagnosed with one of eight specified cancer types or where participants were judged to be representative of all people with cancer. For each included study, the number of patients who developed clinically apparent VTE, and the total person-years of follow-up were extracted. Incidence rates of VTE were pooled across studies using the generic inverse variance method. In total, data from 38 individual studies were included. Among average-risk patients, the overall risk of VTE was estimated to be 13 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 7 to 23), with the highest risk among patients with cancers of the pancreas, brain, and lung. Among patients judged to be at high risk (due to metastatic disease or receipt of high-risk treatments), the risk of VTE was 68 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 48 to 96), with the highest risk among patients with brain cancer (200 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI, 162 to 247). Our results need to be considered in light of high levels of heterogeneity, which exist due to differences in study population, outcome definition, and average duration of follow-up between studies.
Conclusions: VTE occurs in greater than 1% of cancer patients each year, but this varies widely by cancer type and time since diagnosis. The absolute VTE risks obtained from this review can aid in clinical decision-making about which people with cancer should receive anticoagulant prophylaxis and at what times.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures











Similar articles
-
Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- and venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 08;11:CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub4. PMID: 28832905 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- or venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 1;10(10):CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34597414 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29687454 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(11):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta10110. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16595080
-
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28901021 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prognostic value of circulating markers of neutrophil activation, neutrophil extracellular traps, coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with terminal cancer.Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 3;11(1):5074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84476-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33658563 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors and Thrombophilia Evaluation in Venous Thromboembolism.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 9;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020362. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of site-specific cancer in incident venous thromboembolism: a population-based study.Thromb Res. 2015 Mar;135(3):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 16. Thromb Res. 2015. PMID: 25547213 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Incidence and features in a racially diverse population.J Thromb Haemost. 2022 Oct;20(10):2366-2378. doi: 10.1111/jth.15818. Epub 2022 Aug 7. J Thromb Haemost. 2022. PMID: 35830203 Free PMC article.
-
Net Clinical Benefit of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Trade-Off Analysis From 9 Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 12;9:575. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00575. eCollection 2018. Front Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29946255 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Heit JA, Cohen AT, Anderson FA Jr (2005) on behalf of the VTE Impact Assessment Group (2005) Estimated annual number of incident and recurrent, non-fatal and fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the US. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 106: 910.
-
- Heit JA, O'Fallon WM, Petterson TM, Lohse CM, Silverstein MD, et al. (2002) Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med 162: 1245–1248. - PubMed
-
- Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, Baron JA (2000) Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 343: 1846–1850. - PubMed
-
- Vincent GK, Velkoff VA (2010) The next four decades—the older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Population estimates and projections. Washington (District of Columbia): US Census Bureau.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical