Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Aug 10;91(2):313-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

Exome sequencing identifies FUS mutations as a cause of essential tremor

Affiliations
Case Reports

Exome sequencing identifies FUS mutations as a cause of essential tremor

Nancy D Merner et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by a postural or motion tremor. Despite a strong genetic basis, a gene with rare pathogenic mutations that cause ET has not yet been reported. We used exome sequencing to implement a simple approach to control for misdiagnosis of ET, as well as phenocopies involving sporadic and senile ET cases. We studied a large ET-affected family and identified a FUS p.Gln290(∗) mutation as the cause of ET in this family. Further screening of 270 ET cases identified two additional rare missense FUS variants. Functional considerations suggest that the pathogenic effects of ET-specific FUS mutations are different from the effects observed when FUS is mutated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases; we have shown that the ET FUS nonsense mutation is degraded by the nonsense-mediated-decay pathway, whereas amyotrophic lateral sclerosis FUS mutant transcripts are not.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Schematic of ET Variants within FUS
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of FUS mRNA Carrying ET and ALS Mutations (A) Lymphoblastoid cells derived from five ET-affected individuals (individuals II:13, III:14, IV:6, IV:11, and IV:12 in Figure S1) who carry the FUS c.868C>T (p.Gln290) mutation and from ALS-affected individuals expressing three different FUS mutations (c.1555C>T [p.Gln519], c.1562G>A [p.Arg521His], and c.1542-2A>C) were treated with the protein-synthesis inhibitor puromycin (300 μg for 6 hr). After this, treated cells were harvested, and total RNA was prepared (Trizol extraction, Invitrogen) alongside the total RNA of untreated cells. Quantitative RT-PCR reactions were then performed with a Taqman probe specific to FUS (∗∗∗p value = 6.47 × 10−5 [comparing the difference in mRNA expression in ET and ALS untreated cells]; ∗∗p value = 0.03 [comparing the difference in mRNA expression in ET and ALS treated cells]). For each group of affected (ET and ALS) individuals, the average levels of expression are plotted. t tests were used for statistics, and error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). (B) Standard nonquantitative RT-PCR reactions were prepared with the RNA used in (A) and primers in the flanking exons (or UTRs) of each mutation. Amplified cDNA was sequenced, and whereas the ALS mutations were seen independently of a puromycin treatment, the ET mutation could only be seen in puromycin-treated cells. (C) Quantitative allele-specific expression measurements of the same five FUS c.868C>T ET individuals from above were made with a set of Taqman custom-designed probes and primers for the wild-type (c.868C) and mutant (c.868T) alleles. After the puromycin treatment, the expression of the mutant allele became detectable. The specificity of the custom probe for the c.868C>T transcript is demonstrated in Figure S5. All expression levels were normalized with the human 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and were calculated in comparison to the average level of expression of two healthy controls. t tests were used for statistics, and error bars correspond to SEM.

Comment in

References

    1. Erickson-Davis C.R., Faust P.L., Vonsattel J.P., Gupta S., Honig L.S., Louis E.D. “Hairy baskets” associated with degenerative Purkinje cell changes in essential tremor. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2010;69:262–271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louis E.D., Ferreira J.J. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov. Disord. 2010;25:534–541. - PubMed
    1. Deuschl G., Bain P., Brin M., Ad Hoc Scientific Committee Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Mov. Disord. 1998;13(Suppl 3):2–23. - PubMed
    1. Jain S., Lo S.E., Louis E.D. Common misdiagnosis of a common neurological disorder: How are we misdiagnosing essential tremor? Arch. Neurol. 2006;63:1100–1104. - PubMed
    1. Schrag A., Münchau A., Bhatia K.P., Quinn N.P., Marsden C.D. Essential tremor: An overdiagnosed condition? J. Neurol. 2000;247:955–959. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances