Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;16(12):2861-71.
doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01605.x.

Towards a roadmap in brain protection and recovery

Affiliations
Review

Towards a roadmap in brain protection and recovery

Dafin F Muresanu et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

This article briefly reviews some of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases, i.e. damage mechanisms (DM), and their interactions and overlap with protection and reparatory processes (i.e. endogenous defence activities). A relationship between DM and endogenous defence activity (EDA) regarding therapy principles will also be described. Currently, it is difficult to find the correct therapeutic approach for brain protection and recovery, especially because we do not fully understand all of the endogenous neurobiological processes, the complete nature of the pathophysiological mechanisms and the links between these two categories. Moreover, we continue to use a simplistic and reductionist approach in this respect. Endogenous neurobiological processes, such as neurotrophicity, neuroprotection, neuroplasticity and neurogenesis, are central to protection and recovery and represent the background of EDA. The biological reality of the nervous system is far more complex. In fact, there is an endogenous holistic process of neuroprotection and neurorecovery that should be approached therapeutically in an integrated way. The current tendency to exclusively frame drug activity in terms of single mechanisms and single focus effect might distract from other paradigms with greater explanatory power and hinder the development of more effective treatment strategies. A change of concept is required in pharmacological brain protection and recovery. Prospective considerations include an integrated pharmacological approach, focusing on drugs with multimodal activity and pleiotropic neuroprotective effect which are biological drugs, rather than single mechanism drugs, which usually are chemical drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Endogenous defence activity and damage mechanism.
Fig 2
Fig 2
The dual roles performed by glutamate makes it a potent and indispensable factor for neurotrophicity and neuroplasticity processes.
Fig 3
Fig 3
NMDAR pro-survival and pro-death signalling.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Classic versus new pharmacological strategies for neuroprotection and neurorecovery.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Multimodal drugs with pleiotropic neuroprotective effect—mechanism of action.

References

    1. Muresanu DF. Neuroprotection and neuroplasticity—a holistic approach and future perspectives. J Neurol Sci. 2007;257:38–43. - PubMed
    1. Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon C-S, et al. The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Med. 2006;3:709–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Labiche LA, Grotta JC. Clinical trials for cytoprotection in stroke. NeuroRx. 2004;1:46–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maas AI, Roozenbeek B, Manley GT. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:115–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials—A Practical Approach. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 1983. p. 265 S.

Substances