Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;39(2):526-38.
doi: 10.1037/a0029492. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements

Affiliations

Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements

Bernhard Angele et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Readers continuously receive parafoveal information about the upcoming word in addition to the foveal information about the currently fixated word. Previous research (Inhoff, Radach, Starr, & Greenberg, 2000) showed that the presence of a parafoveal word that was similar to the foveal word facilitated processing of the foveal word. We used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the parafoveal information that subjects received before or while fixating a target word (e.g., news) within a sentence. Specifically, a reader's parafovea could contain a repetition of the target (news), a correct preview of the posttarget word (once), an unrelated word (warm), random letters (cxmr), a nonword neighbor of the target (niws), a semantically related word (tale), or a nonword neighbor of that word (tule). Target fixation times were significantly lower in the parafoveal repetition condition than in all other conditions, suggesting that foveal processing can be facilitated by parafoveal repetition. We present a simple model framework that can account for these effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Condition examples and display change procedure in Experiment 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Condition examples and display change procedure in Experiment 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
A simple model framework capable of explaining parafoveal repetition effects and orthographic parafoveal-on-foveal effects

References

    1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59:390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B. lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes (R package Ver. 0.999375-28) R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2009.
    1. Blanchard HE, Pollatsek A, Rayner K. The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading. Perception & Psychophysics. 1989;46:85–94. - PubMed
    1. Brysbaert M, Drieghe D, Vitu F. Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance. 2005:53–77.
    1. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review. 2001;108:204–256. - PubMed

Publication types