Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 6;20(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-23.

The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review

Affiliations

The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review

Mario Millan et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range of motion (ROM).

Objective: To assess the quality of the literature and to determine whether or not SMT is associated with an immediate increase in ROM.

Design: A systematic critical literature review.

Method: Systematic searches were performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE using terms relating to manipulation, movement and the spine. Selection of articles was made according to specific criteria by two independent reviewers. Two checklists were created based on the needs of the present review. Articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Articles were given quality scores and the data synthesized for each region treated in the literature. Findings were summarized in tables and reported in a narrative fashion.

Results: Fifteen articles were retained reporting on experiments on the neck, lumbar spine, hip and jaw. The mean quality score was 71/100 (ranges 33/100 - 92/100). A positive effect of SMT was reported in both studies where mouth opening was assessed after cervical manipulation. In five of the nine studies on cervical ROM a positive effect was reported, whereas the remaining four studies did not show improvement. None of the three studies of the lumbar spine showed an effect of SMT on lumbar ROMs and one study of sacroiliac manipulation reported no effect on the ROM of the hip joint.In relation to the quality score, the seven highest ranked studies, showed significant positive effects of SMT on ROM. Continuing down the list, the other studies reported no significant differences in the outcomes between groups.

Conclusion: SMT seems sometimes to have a small effect on ROM, at least in the cervical spine. Further research should concentrate on areas of the spine that have the potential of actually improving to such a degree that a change can be easily uncovered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart describing the process for a systematic critical review of the literature on the effect of SMT on spinal range of motion (from The PRISMA Statement [[56]])

References

    1. Rubinstein S, Van Middelkoop M, Assendelft W, De Boer M, Van Tulder M. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a cochrane review. Spine. 2011;36(13):E825–E846. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182197fe1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leach RA. The chiropractic theories . Fourth. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore; 2004. pp. 131–197–235–246.
    1. Walter H. The biomechanics of spinal manipulation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(3):280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maigne J-Y, Vautravers P. Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70(5):336–341. doi: 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00074-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernon H, Mrozek J. A revised definition of manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(1):68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.009. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources