Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3304-9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3946. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

Randomized phase II trial designs with biomarkers

Affiliations

Randomized phase II trial designs with biomarkers

Boris Freidlin et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Efficient development of targeted therapies that may only benefit a fraction of patients requires clinical trial designs that use biomarkers to identify sensitive subpopulations. Various randomized phase III trial designs have been proposed for definitive evaluation of new targeted treatments and their associated biomarkers (eg, enrichment designs and biomarker-stratified designs). Before proceeding to phase III, randomized phase II trials are often used to decide whether the new therapy warrants phase III testing. In the presence of a putative biomarker, the phase II trial should also provide information as to what type of biomarker phase III trial is appropriate. A randomized phase II biomarker trial design is proposed, which, after completion, recommends the type of phase III trial to be used for the definitive testing of the therapy and the biomarker. The recommendations include the possibility of proceeding to a randomized phase III of the new therapy with or without using the biomarker and also the possibility of not testing the new therapy further. Evaluations of the proposed trial design using simulations and published data demonstrate that it works well in providing recommendations for phase III trial design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Decision algorithm for recommendation of phase III trial design based on the outcome of the proposed phase II biomarker trial design. H0, null hypothesis in the overall group; H0(+), null hypothesis in the biomarker-positive subgroup; HR, hazard ratio; HR(+), HR of standard therapy relative to targeted therapy in biomarker-positive subgroup; HR(−), HR of standard therapy relative to targeted therapy in biomarker-negative subgroup; HR(o), HR of standard therapy relative to targeted therapy in overall group.

References

    1. Freidlin B, McShane LM, Korn EL. Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: Design issues. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:152–160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sequist LV, von Pawel J, Garmey EG, et al. Randomized phase II study of erlotinib plus tivantinib versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3307–3315. - PubMed
    1. Sequist LV, Akerley WL, Brugger W, et al. Final results from arq 197-209: A global randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial of erlotinib plus arq 197 versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated egfr-inhibitor naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Presented at the European Society of Clinical Oncology Congress; October 8-12, 2010; Milan, Italy. (abstr 3630)
    1. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:947–957. - PubMed
    1. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003. - PubMed