Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;2(1):69-73.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2010.196. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

Soluble VEGF receptor-2 may be a predictive marker of anti-angiogenic therapy with clinically available safe agents

Affiliations

Soluble VEGF receptor-2 may be a predictive marker of anti-angiogenic therapy with clinically available safe agents

Hitoshi Yoshiji et al. Oncol Lett. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

The identification of biomarkers of anti-angiogenic therapy that predict clinical benefit is of vital importance. We previously reported that a combination treatment with clinically available safe agents, specifically angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and vitamin K (VK), inhibited the cumulative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via suppression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The present study aimed to identify non-invasive biological markers that predict the clinically beneficial effect of this combination regimen. A combination of ACE-I (perindopril; 4 mg/day) and VK (menatetrenone; 45 mg/day) was administered for 54 months following curative therapy for HCC. The cumulative recurrence and several indices, which are reportedly considered as biological markers of anti-angiogenic therapies, were analyzed. The combined treatment of ACE-I and VK markedly inhibited the cumulative recurrence of HCC during the 54-month follow-up. The serum VEGF and soluble VEGF receptor (sVEGFR)-2 were significantly suppressed with this combination regimen, whereas sVEGFR-1 was not. In HCC patients without recurrence, a significant suppression of VEGF and sVEGFR-2 was achieved within 6 and 3 months after treatment, respectively. In conclusion, the combination treatment of ACE-I and VK is a potentially novel anti-angiogenic strategy for secondary chemoprevention against HCC since the two agents are widely used in clinical practice without serious side effects. Furthermore, sVEGFR-2 may become a useful clinical predictive marker of this combination treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative recurrence of secondary HCC after curative therapy with the combination treatment of ACE-I and VK for 54 months. The combination treatment of ACE-I and VK (G2, n=26) significantly inhibited the cumulative recurrence of HCC as compared to the control group (G1, n=28). *Statistically significant differences between G1 and G2 (p<0.01).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of the combination treatment of ACE-I and VK on serum VEGF, sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-2 levels. (A) The serum VEGF level in the control group (G1) increased after 12 months, whereas the combination treatment of ACE-I and VK (G2) markedly attenuated the VEGF level as compared to the pre-treatment level. (B) No significant differences were noted in sVEGFR-1 between the pre-treatment and post-treatment levels in the two groups. (C) On the other hand, sVEGFR-2 was markedly decreased by the combination treatment of ACE-I and VK, whereas the serum level of sVEGFR2 in the control group increased. The data represent means ± SD (n=15). *Statistically significant differences between G1 and G2 (p<0.01).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chronological alterations of VEGF and sVEGFR-2 during 12 months of treatment in patients in the treated group without HCC recurrence. VEGF expression gradually decreased, and the expression level at 6 months after treatment was statistically significant as compared to the pre-treatment basal level. The decrease in sVEGFR-2 expression occurred earlier than that of VEGF. sVEGFR-2 expression was noted to have already significantly decreased at 3 months after ACE-I and VK combination treatment. The data represent the means ± SD (n=25). *Statistically significant differences as compared to the pre-treatment basal level (p<0.01).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schafer DF, Sorrell MF. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 1999;353:1253–1257. - PubMed
    1. Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis: past, present and the near future. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:505–515. - PubMed
    1. Guo RP, Zhong C, Shi M, et al. Clinical value of apoptosis and angiogenesis factors in estimating the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006;132:547–555. - PubMed
    1. Iavarone M, Lampertico P, Iannuzzi F, et al. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14:133–139. - PubMed
    1. Li CY, Shan S, Huang Q, et al. Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:143–147. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources