Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 7:12:103.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-103.

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment

Affiliations

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment

Ron Schellings et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Health care regulatory agencies perform audits or inspections to judge the quality and safety of health care. This judgment is based on the assessment of a large set of health care indicators as accepted by the profession. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the influence of these indicators and whether a smaller number would be sufficient for a quality assessment or audit procedure.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed for the assessment of quality of care regarding the management of patients with schizophrenia and drug dependency in psychiatric institutes. Based on multidisciplinary guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and a visit of (co)inspectors of the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate at all 33 integrated mental hospitals a set of 51 indicators were assessed in a subsequent interview. With the analysis of the results, 6 attributes were selected for the DCE as quality indicators.

Results: Seventy-six percent of all health services (co)inspectors (n = 33) involved in the inspection of mental health services, participated in the experiment. Respondents considered an operational elaborate treatment plan the most important indicator for the assessment of quality of care in a psychiatric institute, followed by a general care program, treatment outcome measurement, and involvement in treatment of patients and relatives. Pharmacotherapy and governance responsibility were valued as less important indicators.

Conclusions: The results of this DCE show that there is a prioritisation in the six selected quality indicators. This might help health services (co) inspectors to enhance the efficiency and transparency of the quality of care assessment for patients with schizophrenia and/or drug dependency in psychiatric institutes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Walshe K. Regulating healthcare: a prescription for improvement? Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2003.
    1. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ. 2004;328:360–361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.360. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Vol 11. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2008.
    1. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000;320:1530–1533. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lanscar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:661–677. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources