Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep;10(3):290-8.
doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0011. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern

Daniel Patrone  1 , David Resnik, Lisa Chin
Affiliations
Review

Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern

Daniel Patrone et al. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Dual-use research of concern (DURC) is scientific research with significant potential for generating information that could be used to harm national security, the public health, or the environment. Editors responsible for journal policies and publication decisions play a vital role in ensuring that effective safeguards exist to cope with the risks of publishing scientific research with dual-use implications. We conducted an online survey of 127 chief editors of life science journals in 27 countries to examine their attitudes toward and experience with the review and publication of dual-use research of concern. Very few editors (11) had experience with biosecurity review, and no editor in our study reported having ever refused a submission on biosecurity grounds. Most respondents (74.8%) agreed that editors have a responsibility to consider biosecurity risks during the review process, but little consensus existed among editors on how to handle specific issues in the review and publication of research with potential dual-use implications. More work is needed to establish consensus on standards for the review and publication of dual-use research of concern in life science journals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Committee on Assessing Fundamental Attitudes of Life Scientists as a Basis for Biosecurity Education, National Research Council. A Survey of Attitudes and Actions on Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences: A Collaborative Effort of the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Research Standards and Practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology, National Research Council. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. Journal Editors and Authors Group. Uncensored exchange of scientific results. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(4):1464. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Proposed Framework for the Oversight of Dual Use Life Sciences Research: Strategies for Minimizing the Potential Misuse of Research Information. 2007. http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/pdf/Framework%20for%20transmittal%2008.... [Jan 8;2012 ]. http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/pdf/Framework%20for%20transmittal%2008...
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Press statement on the NSABB review of H5N1 research [press release] Dec 20, 2011. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/dec2011/od-20.htm. [May 15;2012 ]. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/dec2011/od-20.htm

MeSH terms