Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug 8;308(6):581-90.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9282.

Association of weight status with mortality in adults with incident diabetes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Association of weight status with mortality in adults with incident diabetes

Mercedes R Carnethon et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

  • JAMA. 2012 Nov 28;308(20):2085

Abstract

Context: Type 2 diabetes in normal-weight adults (body mass index [BMI] <25) is a representation of the metabolically obese normal-weight phenotype with unknown mortality consequences.

Objective: To test the association of weight status with mortality in adults with new-onset diabetes in order to minimize the influence of diabetes duration and voluntary weight loss on mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: Pooled analysis of 5 longitudinal cohort studies: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, 1990-2006; Cardiovascular Health Study, 1992-2008; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, 1987-2011; Framingham Offspring Study, 1979-2007; and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, 2002-2011. A total of 2625 participants with incident diabetes contributed 27,125 person-years of follow-up. Included were men and women (age >40 years) who developed incident diabetes based on fasting glucose 126 mg/dL or greater or newly initiated diabetes medication and who had concurrent measurements of BMI. Participants were classified as normal weight if their BMI was 18.5 to 24.99 or overweight/obese if BMI was 25 or greater.

Main outcome measures: Total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality.

Results: The proportion of adults who were normal weight at the time of incident diabetes ranged from 9% to 21% (overall 12%). During follow-up, 449 participants died: 178 from cardiovascular causes and 253 from noncardiovascular causes (18 were not classified). The rates of total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality were higher in normal-weight participants (284.8, 99.8, and 198.1 per 10,000 person-years, respectively) than in overweight/obese participants (152.1, 67.8, and 87.9 per 10,000 person-years, respectively). After adjustment for demographic characteristics and blood pressure, lipid levels, waist circumference, and smoking status, hazard ratios comparing normal-weight participants with overweight/obese participants for total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality were 2.08 (95% CI, 1.52-2.85), 1.52 (95% CI, 0.89-2.58), and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.55-3.48), respectively.

Conclusion: Adults who were normal weight at the time of incident diabetes had higher mortality than adults who are overweight or obese.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplain-Meier Survial Estimates Comparing Mortality in Participants Stratified by Weight Status at the Time of Incident Diabetes
Red Line = Normal Weight (BMI 18.5 – 24.9 kg/2) Blue Line=Overweight/Obese (BMI > 25 kg/m2)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of mortality by weight status (normal weight vs. overweight/obese), stratified by subgroup
Adjusted for age, race, gender, education, waist circumference, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking status (ever. vs. never). Statistical significance (P-value) for interaction term based on the maximum likelihood χ2 from a proportional hazards model that included a multiplicative interaction term. PAR= Population at Risk. Normal weight = BMI 18.5 – 24.99 kg/m2; Overweight/Obese = BMI >= 25 kg/m2.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ruderman NB, Schneider SH, Berchtold P. The “metabolically-obese,” normal-weight individual. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34(8):1617–1621. - PubMed
    1. Gregg EW, Cadwell BL, Cheng YJ, et al. Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(12):2806–2812. - PubMed
    1. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO, Romero-Corral A. Body composition and heart failure prevalence and prognosis: getting to the fat of the matter in the “obesity paradox”. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(7):605–608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uretsky S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, et al. Obesity paradox in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Am J Med. 2007;120(10):863–870. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt D, Salahudeen A. The Obesity-Survival Paradox in Hemodialysis Patients: Why Do Overweight Hemodialysis Patients Live Longer? Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2007;22(1):11–15. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding