Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm
- PMID: 22872549
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1
Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm
Abstract
Selective attention to relevant targets has been shown to depend on the availability of working memory (WM). Under conditions of high WM load, processing of irrelevant distractors is enhanced. Here we showed that this detrimental effect of WM load on selective attention efficiency is reversed when the task requires global- rather than local-level processing. Participants were asked to attend to either the local or the global level of a hierarchical Navon stimulus while keeping either a low or a high load in WM. In line with previous findings, during attention to the local level, distractors at the global level produced more interference under high than under low WM load. By contrast, loading WM had the opposite effect of improving selective attention during attention to the global level. The findings demonstrate that the impact of WM load on selective attention is not invariant, but rather is dependent on the level of the to-be-attended information.
Similar articles
-
Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1533-55. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1533. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20675799
-
Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):308-16. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.308. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20139447
-
Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients.Brain Cogn. 2010 Dec;74(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Brain Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20846773
-
The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1080-107. doi: 10.1037/a0020367. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20873935
-
Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;20(11):1388-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02454.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Psychol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19843262
Cited by
-
Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 13;18(6):e0287057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287057. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37310969 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28. Cogn Process. 2018. PMID: 29185170
-
Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.Front Psychol. 2013 May 21;4:287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23734139 Free PMC article.
-
Synchrony effect on joint attention.Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2449-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4984-6. Epub 2017 May 16. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28509111
-
Neural effects of cognitive control load on auditory selective attention.Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:269-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Neuropsychologia. 2014. PMID: 24946314 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources