Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspective
- PMID: 22872705
- PMCID: PMC3461636
- DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200773
Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspective
Abstract
Background: Sanger sequencing (SS) of PCR products is still the most frequent method to test colorectal cancer for KRAS mutations in routine practice.
Methods: An audit of SS on 1720 routine cases was carried out, taking into account age, gender, specimen type (resection vs biopsies), tumour site (primary vs metastasis), tumour stage, neoplastic cells abundance (>30% vs <30%) and fixation type (buffered formalin vs simple formalin). In a subset of 50 wild-type (WT) patients correlations between SS findings and response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated.
Results: The tests were informative in 1691 cases (98.3%). Mutations were detected in 671 cases (39.6%). No significant differences in mutation rates were observed with respect to age (p=0.2), gender (p=0.2), specimen type (p=0.3) and formalin fixation (p=0.08). Conversely, KRAS mutant rate was higher in metastatic tissue (50% vs 39%, p=0.02), in samples with over 30% of neoplastic cells (43.4% vs 26.6%, p=0.02) and in tumours tested in stage IV (p=0.05). The RR of SS KRAS WT patients was 26% (one complete and 12 partial responses). The disease control rate (objective responses plus stable disease) was 56%. Median PFS was 4.4 months and median OS was 10.4 months.
Conclusions: Pathological criteria that make SS a more robust method for KRAS testing and treatment response prediction are neoplastic cell abundance, metastatic tissue sample and stage IV primary tumour.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Lancet Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20619739
-
Analysis of KRAS/NRAS Mutations in a Phase III Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI Compared with FOLFIRI Alone as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 15;21(24):5469-79. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0526. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Clin Cancer Res. 2015. PMID: 26341920 Clinical Trial.
-
KRAS mutation detection by high-resolution melting analysis significantly predicts clinical benefit of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 7;107(4):626-31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.275. Epub 2012 Jul 17. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22805329 Free PMC article.
-
KRAS mutations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but are not predictive for benefit with cediranib.Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Eur J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23510802
-
[Technical considerations for KRAS testing in colorectal cancer. The biologist's point of view].Bull Cancer. 2009 Dec;96 Suppl:S47-56. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0996. Bull Cancer. 2009. PMID: 20034870 Review. French.
Cited by
-
"Squirrel" Primer-Based PCR Assay for Direct and Targeted Sanger Sequencing of Short Genomic Segments.J Biomol Tech. 2017 Sep;28(3):97-110. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2803-001. Epub 2017 Jun 6. J Biomol Tech. 2017. PMID: 28785174 Free PMC article.
-
A Narrative Review of RAS Mutations in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 26;61(3):408. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030408. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40142219 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Describing the Prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Gene Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology Res. 2020 Oct;13(5):184-198. doi: 10.14740/gr1167. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Gastroenterology Res. 2020. PMID: 33224365 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization of high-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms.Br J Cancer. 2024 Jul;131(1):159-170. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02705-8. Epub 2024 May 10. Br J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38729995 Free PMC article.
-
The ideal reporting of RAS testing in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a pathologists' perspective.Pathologica. 2023 Jun 14;115(3):137-47. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-895. Online ahead of print. Pathologica. 2023. PMID: 37314870 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- van Krieken JH, Jung A, Kirchner T, et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch 2008;453:417–31 - PubMed
-
- Ciardiello F, Tortora G. EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1160–74 - PubMed
-
- Tol J, Punt CJ. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. Clin Ther 2010;32:437–53 - PubMed
-
- Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1408–17 - PubMed
-
- Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2091–6 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous