Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 8:13:78.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-78.

Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice

Affiliations

Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice

Sean Robison et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) are involved in the management of most melanocytic skin lesions in Australia. A high quality biopsy technique is a crucial first step in management, as it is recognized that poor techniques can mislead, delay, or miss a diagnosis of melanoma. There has been little published on the biopsy decisions and techniques of GPs. This study aims to describe the current management choices made by GPs for suspicious melanocytic skin lesions and to compare their choices with the best practice guidelines.

Methods: An anonymous survey of GPs presented with three clinical scenarios with increasing complexity of melanoma in which a referral or biopsy decision was specified.

Results: 391 mailed surveys with a 76.3% response rate. Mean biopsy experience was 4.14 biopsies per GP per month. The rates of choosing to refer among the three scenarios were 31%, 52% and 81% respectively, with referral to surgery being the most common choice (81%). Most biopsy techniques (55%) were chosen according to best practice guidelines, although non-guideline biopsy techniques chosen included shave (n=10), punch biopsy (n=57), wide excisions (n=65), and flaps (n=10). The few GPs (n=5) who identified themselves as skin specialist GPs were no more likely to adhere to guidelines than their colleagues.

Conclusion: A majority of referrals and biopsies were chosen by GPs according to best practice guidelines, but concern remains for the high proportion of GPs making non-guideline based choices. How GPs choose to biopsy or refer needs further training, audit, and research if Australia is to improve the outcome of melanoma management in general practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia, an overview 2008. Canberra AIHW and Australian Association of Cancer Registries, Canberra; 2008. AIHW Catalogue No. 18) Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/can/ca08.pdf (accessed Sept 2008.
    1. Baade PD, Youl PH, English DR, Elwood JM, Aitken JF. Clinical pathways to diagnose melanoma: a population-based study. Melanoma Res. 2007;17(4):243–249. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328194f265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Askew DA, Wilkinson D, Schluter PJ, Eckert K. Skin cancer surgery in Australia 2001-2005: the changing role of the general practitioner. Med J Aust. 2007;187(4):210–214. - PubMed
    1. Burton RC, Howe C, Adamson L. et al.General practitioner screening for melanoma: sensitivity, specificity, and effect of training. J Med Screen. 1998;5(3):156–161. - PubMed
    1. Paine SL, Cockburn J, Noy SM, Marks R. Early detection of skin-cancer - knowledge, perceptions and practices of general-practitioners in Victoria. Med J Aust. 1994;161(3):188–195. - PubMed

MeSH terms