Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;16(4):730-7.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003333. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

Patients' evaluation of hospital foodservice quality in Italy: what do patients really value?

Affiliations

Patients' evaluation of hospital foodservice quality in Italy: what do patients really value?

Gabriele Messina et al. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Patients often do not eat/drink enough during hospitalization. To enable patients to meet their energy and nutritional requirements, food and catering service quality and staff support are therefore important. We assessed patients' satisfaction with hospital food and investigated aspects influencing it.

Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study collecting patients' preferences using a slightly modified version of the Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACHFPSQ). Factor analysis was carried out to reduce the number of food-quality and staff-issue variables. Univariate and multivariate ordinal categorical regression models were used to assess the association between food quality, staff issues, patients' characteristics, hospital recovery aspects and overall foodservice satisfaction (OS).

Setting: A university hospital in Florence, Italy, in the period November-December 2009.

Subjects: Hospital patients aged 18+ years (n 927).

Results: Of the 1288 questionnaires distributed, 927 were returned completely or partially filled in by patients and 603 were considered eligible for analysis. Four factors (explained variance 64·3 %, Cronbach's alpha α(C) = 0.856), i.e. food quality (FQ; α(C) = 0·74), meal service quality (MSQ; α(C) = 0·73), hunger and quantity (HQ; α(C) = 0·74) and staff/service issues (SI; α(C) = 0·65), were extracted from seventeen items. Items investigating staff/service issues were the most positively rated while certain items investigating food quality were the least positively rated. After ordinal multiple regression analysis, OS was only significantly associated with the four factors: FQ, MSQ, HQ and SI (OR = 17·2, 6·16, 3·09 and 1·75, respectively, P < 0·001), and gender (OR = 1·53, P = 0·024).

Conclusions: The most positively scored aspects of foodservice concerned staff/service, whereas food quality was considered less positive. The aspects that most influenced patients' satisfaction were those related to food quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lassen KO, Kruse F & Bjerrum M (2005) Nutritional care of Danish medical in patients – patients’ perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci 19, 259–267. - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen HH, Holst M & Kondrup J (2010) Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals. Clin Epidemiol 2, 209–216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sauerwein HP & Serlie MJ (2010) Optimal nutrition and its potential effect on survival in critically ill patients. Neth J Med 68, 119–122. - PubMed
    1. St-Arnaud-McKenzie D, Paquet C, Kergoat MJ et al. (2004) Hunger and aversion: drives that influence food intake of hospitalized geriatric patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59, 1304–1309. - PubMed
    1. Ruxton CH, Gordon J, Kirkwood L et al. (2008) Risk of malnutrition in a sample of acute and long-stay NHS Fife in-patients: an audit. J Hum Nutr Diet 21, 81–90. - PubMed