Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;19(4):209-16.
doi: 10.3747/co.19.981.

Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice, and actionable recommendations for Ontario

Affiliations

Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice, and actionable recommendations for Ontario

G C Turnbull Macdonald et al. Curr Oncol. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: We set out to create a psychosocial oncology care framework and a set of relevant recommendations that can be used to improve the quality of comprehensive cancer care for Ontario patients and their families.meet the psychosocial health care needs of cancer patients and their families at both the provider and system levels.

Data sources and methods: The adapte process and the practice guideline development cycle were used to adapt the 10 recommendations from the 2008 U.S. Institute of Medicine standard Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs into the psychosocial oncology care framework. In addition, the evidence contained in the original document was used, in combination with the expertise of the working group, to create a set of actionable recommendations. Refinement after formal external review was conducted.

Data extraction and synthesis: The new framework consists of 8 defining domains. Of those 8 domains, 7 were adapted from recommendations in the source document; 1 new domain, to raise awareness about the need for psychosocial support of cancer patients and their families, was added. To ensure high-quality psychosocial care and services, 31 actionable recommendations were created. The document was submitted to an external review process. More than 70% of practitioners rated the quality of the advice document as high and reported that they would recommend its use.

Conclusions: This advice document advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to cancer care in response to the distress experienced by cancer patients and their families. The recommendations will be useful in future to measure performance, quality of practice, and access to psychosocial services.

Keywords: Guideline; cancer; framework; patient-centred care; psychosocial oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Psychosocial Oncology Framework. Adapted from Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs (p. 158).

References

    1. Brown ML, Lipscomb J, Snyder C. The burden of illness of cancer: economic cost and quality of life. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:91–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.91. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: globocan 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalton SO, Laursen TM, Ross L, Mortensen PB, Johansen C. Risk for hospitalization with depression after a cancer diagnosis: a nationwide, population-based study of cancer patients in Denmark from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1440–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5526. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T, et al. Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ. 2004;170:1795–801. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Longo CJ, Fitch M, Deber RB, Williams AP. Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:1077–85. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0088-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources