Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
- PMID: 22876746
- PMCID: PMC3533694
- DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-49
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
Abstract
Background: Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation.
Methods: Slides for indirect IF were prepared, containing BIOCHIPS with the following test substrates in each reaction field: monkey esophagus, primate salt-split skin, antigen dots of tetrameric BP180-NC16A as well as desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and BP230gC-expressing human HEK293 cells. This BIOCHIP mosaic was probed using a large panel of sera from patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n=65), pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n=50), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n=42), and non-inflammatory skin diseases (n=97) as well as from healthy blood donors (n=100). Furthermore, to evaluate the usability in routine diagnostics, 454 consecutive sera from patients with suspected immunobullous disorders were prospectively analyzed in parallel using a) the IF BIOCHIP mosaic and b) a panel of single antibody assays as commonly used by specialized centers.
Results: Using the BIOCHIP mosaic, sensitivities of the desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and NC16A-specific substrates were 90%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. BP230 was recognized by 54% of the BP sera. Specificities ranged from 98.2% to 100% for all substrates. In the prospective study, a high agreement was found between the results obtained by the BIOCHIP mosaic and the single test panel for the diagnosis of BP, PV, PF, and sera without serum autoantibodies (Cohen's κ between 0.88 and 0.97).
Conclusions: The BIOCHIP mosaic contains sensitive and specific substrates for the indirect IF diagnosis of BP, PF, and PV. Its diagnostic accuracy is comparable with the conventional multi-step approach. The highly standardized and practical BIOCHIP mosaic will facilitate the serological diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.
Figures



Similar articles
-
BIOCHIP mosaic for the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases in Chinese patients.Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):338-344. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3839. Eur J Dermatol. 2020. PMID: 32969793
-
Multicenter prospective study on multivariant diagnostics of autoimmune bullous dermatoses using the BIOCHIP technology.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Nov;83(5):1315-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.049. Epub 2020 Jan 28. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020. PMID: 32004645
-
Autoantibody detection by conventional and novel mosaic BIOCHIP technique: A comparative analysis for the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2025 Jul-Aug;91(4):482-487. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_1089_2024. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2025. PMID: 40357957
-
A new indirect immunofluorescence BIOCHIP method for the serological diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid: A review of literature.Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;60(3):e173-e177. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13034. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Australas J Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 30968398
-
Detection of circulating anti-skin antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and by ELISA: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Sep 25;58(10):1623-1633. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1031. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020. PMID: 32335537
Cited by
-
Mechanisms of Autoantibody-Induced Pathology.Front Immunol. 2017 May 31;8:603. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00603. eCollection 2017. Front Immunol. 2017. PMID: 28620373 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Techniques in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.Br J Biomed Sci. 2023 Nov 24;80:11809. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2023.11809. eCollection 2023. Br J Biomed Sci. 2023. PMID: 38074463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The significance of preclinical anti-BP180 autoantibodies.Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 8;13:963401. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.963401. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36003369 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New biochip immunofluorescence test for the serological diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus: A review of the literature.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Feb 3;4(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.10.001. eCollection 2018 Jun. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29872685 Free PMC article. Review.
-
State-of-the-art diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1363032. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363032. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38903493 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Eming R, Hertl M. Autoimmune bullous disorders. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:144–149. - PubMed
-
- Kanwar AJ, De D. Pemphigus in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77:439–449. - PubMed
-
- Marazza G, Pham HC, Scharer L, Pedrazzetti PP, Hunziker T, Trueb RM, Hohl D, Itin P, Lautenschlager S, Naldi L, Borradori L. Incidence of bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus in Switzerland: a 2-year prospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:861–868. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous