Vaginal prolapse repair: suture repair versus mesh augmentation: a urogynecology perspective

Abstract

Based on the growing evidence within our literature, mesh is clearly needed for long-term success for the repair of anterior/apical defects. Clear credentialing and clinical privilege criteria policies are long overdue. Current data are rapidly growing, with level I studies completed that demonstrate that when transvaginal mesh-augmented repair is used in appropriately selected patients for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse, the procedure has a favorable risk/benefit ratio when compared with suture repair. This article highlights the evolving clinical-based experiences of the authors that are primarily grounded in reality-based medicine with the consideration and incorporation of evidence-based medicine.