Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2012 Oct;55(10):2555-2558.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2683-1. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

Genetic risk scores ascertained in early adulthood and the prediction of type 2 diabetes later in life

Affiliations
Comment

Genetic risk scores ascertained in early adulthood and the prediction of type 2 diabetes later in life

P W Franks. Diabetologia. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

It is hoped that information garnered from studies on population genetics will one day be translated into a form in which it meaningfully improves the prediction, prevention or treatment of type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes genetics researchers have made extraordinary progress in identifying common genetic variants that are associated with type 2 diabetes, which has shed light on the biological pathways in which molecular defects that cause the disease likely reside. However, the expectation that genetic discoveries will aid the prevention or treatment of type 2 diabetes has not, so far, been fulfilled. In a paper published in this edition of the journal, Vassy and colleagues (DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2637-7) test the hypothesis that the predictive accuracy of established genetic risk markers for type 2 diabetes varies by age, with the predictive accuracy being greatest in younger cohorts. The authors found no substantive support for this hypothesis. However, a number of interesting questions are raised by their study concerning why risk alleles for a given genotype may differ in younger and older cohorts and why prospective cohort studies may yield results that are inconsistent with those derived from cross-sectional studies; this commentary discusses these points.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 29;350(18):1838-49 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1996 Dec 5;384(6608):455-8 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes. 2011 Apr;60(4):1340-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2220-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Feb;103(2):226-35 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources